Excerpt from Thesis:
Other certain risks to patrol representatives, including all those operating in pairs, include common procedures suggested by previous studies with the circumstances through which attacks about officers occurred. For example , interviews with prisoners who attacked officers throughout their arrests disclosed that many this kind of attacks had been initiated by the subject upon realization that their criminal arrest was impending. In many cases, it absolutely was the radio transmitting alerting the officers in the subject’s desired status that was overheard by the subject.
Effective risk management in this regard resulted in the use of law enforcement officials codes, both equally for the officer to alert mail that the subject was in ability to hear range, and in addition for law enforcement officials dispatchers to advise officials as to the subject’s status with out alerting the offender concurrently (Sweeney, 2005).
Likewise, various other specific risks associated with the policing and correctional environment happen to be effectively decreased by the application of risk management rules, including the prohibition of guns within the section of police facilities where officers and prisoners are within close physical proximity. The actual comparative risks associated with the incapability of an specific officer to defend himself against an unexpected harm by prisoners is much better maintained by option means (such as the through the use of online video surveillance over the facility) than through reliance of weapons. Whereas officials are exposed to increased risks with out access to their very own sidearms, the comparatively much greater risks happen to be those connected with a violator’s successfully disarming an police officer. For this certain reason, powerful risk management inside police areas and correctional facilities generally require that officers protect their sidearms in lockers located beyond the hostage intake and holding areas (Buerger Levin, 2005).
Similar concerns apply in courtroom facilities, only that the multiple roles of court officers generally needs them to be armed at all times to properly conduct their professional responsibilities of safeguarding judges, juries, court employees, and the public. Accordingly, rather than instituting precisely the same mandatory fulsome policies which might be appropriate inside police areas, court security managers generally manage the specific risk of offenders possibly attacking a solitary officer by requiring that court officers always take lone criminals in pairs, with corresponding ratios of officers to offenders since necessitated simply by risk management preparing scenarios (Sweeney, 2005). In principle, risk management within the criminal justice environment requires expecting potential risk scenarios and establishing techniques for reducing those risks through plan and treatment.
Buerger, M., Levin, B. (2005) the Future of Officer Safety in an Age of Terrorism. The FBI Law Enforcement Message; Vol. seventy four No . being unfaithful, (pp. 2-8).
Larsen, 3rd there’s r. (2007) Our Worst Adversary: Asking the best Questions About Security to guard You, Your Family, and