Download now
In the beginning scenes from the documentary, The Fog of War, Robert McNamara declares, “Any military commander who may be honest confesses that this individual has made faults, errors of judgment. ” Throughout the documented, I got the sense that McNamara is usually asking for forgiveness from the American public and is telling them that this individual wishes points went differently. There are many occasions throughout the film that McNamara is a sympathetic figure, but they are mainly towards deaths and tragedies of the American persons and soldiers, and less on the tragedies in the Vietnamese.
As the Secretary of Defense, portion underneath the rule of the Director, McNamara had not been and should not need been critical of the position that he played; he was carrying out the orders in which he was provided at the most effective manner this individual could. Most of the lessons of war that McNamara talks of were not applied in Vietnam and, in hindsight, were essential mistakes manufactured by the United States in handling the specific situation in Vietnam.
In the end, it absolutely was clear that McNamara wanted the visitors to understand the difficulties and hardships faced during a wartime environment and that no war could be fought with no massive tragedies. “I think the human competition needs to think more about killing, about conflict. Is that what we want in this 21st Century? ” McNamara says this kind of line at the beginning in the documented, which units him up for being a sympathetic and remorseful figure from the Vietnam War. His emotions on war seem to be that the bad outweighs the good, and it is near impossible to take a blind vision to the loss.
He doesn’t want war to be the determinant of the future of nations; he wants the human competition to think a lot of repercussions of committing these kinds of violent functions before making them. One event he addresses of with sympathy is definitely the Tokyo bombings in WORLD WAR II, when he admits the poop were not proportionate to the goals they were planning to achieve. That were there already attained total break down of the population, killing more than half, and they decided to drop bombs over the cities, totally disregarding the aftermath of such an action.
McNamara sympathizes with the Japanese people who had to xperience this kind of disaster and he knows that it was not really in the best interest for anybody to take such extreme actions. Another signal of compassion from McNamara was if he spoke of the tragic suicide of Grettle Morrison, which occurred straight below McNamara’s office outside the Pentagon. This kind of act was a very difficult knowledge for McNamara and the American public to swallow. McNamara’s emotions although telling the storyline showed his deep misery, woe, anguish for Morrison’s family and almost all his supporters, knowing well that McNamara himself was your reason for the civil unrest.
McNamara wishes that warfare did not need to be so grueling but this individual also knows that “in order to do very good, you may have to interact in wicked. ” The documentary is structured around the eleven lessons learned through WWII as well as the Vietnam Warfare. Although they had been obvious to McNamara after the fact, the lessons were not and so clear in the middle of fog. Declining to apply the majority of the lessons discovered set the usa up for an overall total disaster and one that would haunt the American persons for years. One particular lesson that was not used was: Empathize with your foe.
Vietnamese and American nationalities and causes could not be a little more different; including the time wasn’t able to have been more misunderstood, by both sides. In the Vietnamese eyes’, the Us citizens were aiming to pick up the place that the French still left off simply by colonizing the nation and distributing their impact on and philosophy on the Japanese people. In the Americans eyes’, the Japanese, particularly the North, were allying with the Oriental and were planning on growing the values of Communisms across the world.
Equally countries got poor perspective and ill-informed judgment. Acquired the United States empathized and realized who the Vietnamese people were, the desired goals they were planning to achieve as well as the extreme measures they were ready to take for independence, then they would (or should) be aware this warfare was unneeded and away of their reach. Another lessons learned that had not been applied the seventh lesson: Belief and seeing are both often wrong.
This section started off with all the Gulf of Tonkin Episode, in which the U. S. Navy blue had believed the North Vietnamese assaulted them for a second period. This lessons to be found that McNamara echoes of with this matter is that, “We see what we should want to trust. ” America, or LBJ, wanted to believe that the Vietnamese attacked the Navy boats because then the decision was easy, explosive device the North. However , if perhaps there was concern of the disorders, then what is it that the United states of america should do?
Uncertainty brings unwanted problems in to play, and LBJ needed a clear and definite want to attack, showing the American people that the us was not gonna sit back and then let the enemy attack them without any repercussions. If the lesson was applied, then the United States may have searched in to the attack even more and might have found out that there was zero attack in any way, just an mistake in desear.
One lesson McNamara put on his handling of the Vietnam War was, “Never solution the question that is asked of you, answer the question that you might want to be asked. He applied this because they are a typical presidential candidate; he don’t want to stop too much details to the public, which in turn would cause very much controversy and distrust. I choose to apply this lesson towards the last problem, “If McNamara is a good rendering of the men who had taken us to war, what kinds of generalizations could you make about this group…” A lot more appropriate problem in my mind as if McNamara is definitely or can be not a good manifestation of the males who required the U. S to war.
My personal answer is not a. Lyndon B. Johnson and General Westmoreland stick out because the key players in the increased aggression and involvement with the war; whereas McNamara was more of a voice that went unheard by President, a voice of reason, which usually carried the influences of John F. Kennedy. The group that brought us to battle consisted of people who had zero regard to understand the Thai people and others who truly believed that winning the war was right around the corner. McNamara, like JFK, had zero interest in increasing troops, and even sent LBJ a page with advice of how to out and end the war.
LBJ dismissed these types of recommendations, similarly to how Westmoreland dismissed the thought of America shedding its first war. The important thing generalizations of the men who also brought all of us to battle are that they believed the U. T. was invincible and indestructible, that Vietnam was a key player inside the Cold Warfare and if they will fell to Communism, the people all over the world would as well. McNamara did not have these beliefs; he carried out his job the way he was advised to by the President.
This individual knew the fact that war had not been going in the us favor nd that whether it continued it will have only become more serious, which this did. Though it took McNamara time to tell his history of the Vietnam War, this individual told his lessons with urgency. This individual wanted these kinds of lessons being carried on throughout the struggles and hardships that American, and the world, was deemed to manage in the future. This individual admits weight loss win a war to end all battles, but he knows that there are certain aspects and lessons for taking from each situation that can alter the method humanity perceives killing, plus the atrocities of war.
1
