An discursive review of the marx engels visitor by

Category: Rules,
Topics: Karl Marx,
Published: 12.12.2019 | Words: 676 | Views: 330
Download now

I will start my review of this book by citing an excerpt from the Evidente of the Communist Party stating that the communities that have handed and constantly exist is surely an absolute exposition of the conundrum of sociable groups based on the monetary conditions. Since Marx and Engels (1848) put it, “the history of every hitherto existing society may be the history of category struggles. 

Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, continued an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open battle, a battle that each time ended, either in a innovative reconstitution of society at large, or inside the common wreck of the challenging classes.

Need help writing essays?
Free Essays
For only $5.90/page

As it has been experienced for more than one hundred and fifty years, Marxist philosophy triggered much of the planet’s tumultuous incidents. Indeed, dialectics brought dictators down using their thrones, separated oppressed persons, united cowboys, workers and the toiling world towards a new change, and proved that at particular points in history, armed fights are inescapable because the antagonism between the oppressor and the oppressed is a violent contradiction.

It is quite informative to know that Marxist philosophy can be said as the sole philosophy which has deeply rooted among the people, one that stirred their hearts and made the meekest of those grasp famous materialism and dialectical materialism. The answer, I do believe, is that of all of the philosophies that have tried to understand what the world is; just Marxism meddled with how you can change the present conditions. This even flipped peasants into generals, personnel into get together leaders and quite amusing that after the 2nd world warfare, one third of humanity hails from a Marxist society.

While the Manifesto of the Communism Party in pages 469-500 provided all of us with the historical emergence of the bourgeoisie and proletarian school and their certain collision, the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 gave all of us a vibrant understanding of what was the cause of the contradiction among social classes, the hatred within the method of development ” this provides the accumulation of personal property. It is very interesting to know what “labor has brought on and therefore, what I, as a gentleman possessing an ability to you want to “labor, was capable of accomplishing. It also reached my realization though, that for centuries operating men are bound by the shackles of wage labor.

On his Theses on Feuerbach, from pages 143 to 145, Karl Marx explained something about guys which I think is gratifying. He stated that men are neither items nor they may be changed into what exactly they are by the “circumstances or upbringing but it is human activity that creates conditions where human conditions continue. So it could be derived that men are certainly not governed by destiny of pre-supposed existence of metaphysical proportions, alternatively, the world we certainly have right now can be described as world guys has created. This makes myself realize then that wars, famines, low income, and even around the world are the instances that human activity has created as well as the persisting circumstances humanity needs to face.

Even though Karl Marx or Friedrich Engels did not live to find out Russia become the first socialist country in 1917, followed by other East European, Southern region American, Photography equipment and Cookware states, the world has really had philosophers that did not only make an effort to interpret the earth but gone directly to the idea of changing it. True that they may have been grave errors committed by almost all of the socialist regimes but Marxist writings have got changed most of the world we understand today. By my own analysis, Marx and Engels taught men to predict the future based on the preponderance of the scientific brain, based what we should actually observe and think.


Tucker, R. C. (Ed. ). (1999). The Marx-Engels Reader, 2d education. New York: Norton.