Download now
Launch
Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally killing a person to spare her / him from having to deal with more pain and struggling. This is often a debatable issue as a result of moral and ethical parts that are included. This paper will discuss the arguments against euthanasia.
Discussion
Euthanasia is usually clearly up against the Hippocratic Oath that all doctors have to satisfy. This pledge basically declares that doctors must never be involved inside the killing of folks because after all, they have been trained to ensure that individuals are able to get over their illnesses and traumas.
Doctors are definitely the ones who people trust their lives whenever you will discover something wrong with their health. Hence, it is the responsibility of the doctors to constantly do the greatest they can to help people live and enjoy their lives (Cavan 48). If their patients die beneath their direction, the doctors can accept this intended for as long as they will know and will prove that that they really did their best and exhausted most possibilities to guarantee the survival of the patients.
There are only certain occasions where the disease or the damage of the individuals has become and so serious that it is already difficult to treat and make the individuals recover. In these instances, it is unjust to blame the doctors intended for the fatality of the patients. The Hippocratic Oath will help the doctors to realize how important their tasks are to the individuals in terms of their very own health. This oath also provides an confidence to the people that they may trust their very own doctors and stay assured that they can do what ever is necessary to help these groups deal with their health problems. If euthanasia turns into legalized, then the effectiveness with the Hippocratic Oath will be negated and the doctors can have the option of immediately resorting to euthanasia especially in hard cases instead of trying their utmost until the incredibly end.
Another argument against euthanasia is that it is essentially homicide
because the doctors will eliminate the patient even if it has been given the green light by the patient him self or the family of the patient. Euthanasia is not that totally different from murder because they both equally involve eliminating a person. The only big difference is that in euthanasia, there may be mercy and consent included while in murder there is certainly none of them (Tulloch 82). If murder is definitely prohibited by law because people take matters within their own hands and kill others, after that euthanasia should also be suspended because doctors take issues into their own hands and kill all their patients whether or not there is approval from the patients and their families or relatives.
Lastly, the continued improvements and innovations in the field of medicine and health care produce euthanasia illogical to be implemented as a possibility. The reason why medical experts continue to work hard to come up with superior medical technology, medicines and treatment methods is they want to make sure that the unwell people are able to recover faster and healthful people turn into even much healthier. All of these hard work is being done to help make the society are more productive as a result of presence of healthy and strong people (McDougall 26). Thus, doctors will not have an excuse for not undertaking their best because of their patients because they already have usage of the best medical technologies, medications and treatment methods that will stop them via having to resort to euthanasia while the only choice.
Conclusion
There is no doubt that euthanasia needs to be banned because based on the three arguments discussed above, it does not deserve a place in human being society. Doctors must under no circumstances give up on their particular patients regardless of hopeless the situation might be. They have to exhaust all options to offer their sufferers a preventing chance to outlive and
1
