Download now
This is certainly a case regarding the difficulties an established organization has to confront when a new technology produces bothersome effects upon its main business. The truth then offers an example of main capabilities that become outdated with the admittance of new solutions that require new resources and capabilities. Broad theoretical issues that must be regarded as when preparing this case:? How can a mature, successful company survive a disruptive technology? How can happen to be new features built and which ones of these new capabilities are most challenging to develop or perhaps acquire wanting to buy strategic factors?
Specific queries for the preparation with the case-study 1 )
Did Kodak need to divest its substance and drugs businesses? For what reason couldn’t it expand into digital imaging while maintaining the chemical and healthcare interests? 2 . What is Kodak’s strategy for building a existence in digital imaging? 3. Does Kodak possess the resources and capabilities needed to be successful in the market for digital imaging goods? How is Kodak purchasing and building the features it needs? some.
How can the organization of Kodak’s benefit chain alter from traditional digital photography to digital imaging? 5. What tips would you present Dan Carp?
5. How about the performance of this group today? Features Kodak was able to face the challenges of digital image resolution? Material pertaining to the preparing of the case-study (theoretical background)? Ghemawat S. (2006). Technique and the Organization Landscape. Pearson International Edition. Ch. 5. Besanko D., Dranove Deb., Shanley Meters. (2004). Economics of Strategy, Wiley. Ch. 14.? Eisenhardt, K. and J. Martin (2000). Active capabilities: What are they? Ideal Management Journal, (21), pp. 1105-1122 Materials specific for this case-study? 3rd there’s r. Grant (2003) Cases in Contemporary Approach 3rd ed. Blackwell, Oxford. 2 .
Circumstance 2 Virgin This is a case on diversity strategy. The situation illustrates the difficulties in owning a diversified pair of businesses and the consequences of the chaotic development on functionality. Broad assumptive issues that has to be considered while preparing this case:? how can very different businesses be handled by a sole company devoid of destroying benefit? How is it possible to extend your own brand without harmful corporate honesty and strategic fit? Just how is it possible to get back together the pioneeringup-and-coming spirit normal of ‘serial’ entrepreneurs with effective control of a large diversified corporation?
Particular questions intended for the prep of the case-study 1 . What common assets and capabilities link the separate Virgin companies? 2 . Which businesses, if virtually any, should Branson consider divesting? 3. What criteria should Branson apply in determining what new diversification to pursue? four. What changes in the financial framework, organizational framework, and administration systems of the Virgin group would you recommend? 5. Think about the economical and marketplace performance of Virgin Group today? Materials for the preparation with the case-study (theoretical background)? Ghemawat P. (2006).
Strategy and the Business Landscape. Pearson International Edition. Ch. 5 and 6. Besanko D., Dranove D., Shanley M. (2004). Economics of Strategy, Wiley. Ch. 7. Montgomery, C. A. (1994). Corporate diversification. Journal of Economic Points of views 8 (3), 163″ 178.? Material particular to this case-study? R. Grant (2003) Instances in Modern day Strategy 3rd ed. Blackwell, Oxford. 3 Case several General Electric power This is a case on the technique of conglomerate corporations as well as the role of leadership in the creation of novel ways to strategy and management of companies operating in mature markets.
Broad theoretical issues that should be considered while preparing this case:? Precisely what are the most effective devices to put together and control a multi-product firm? How and at what conditions a diversified organization create value for its shareholders? How can an individual charismatic head can shape the functionality of a large varied corporation and exactly how can his ability always be transmitted to executive successors? Specific questions for the preparation with the case-study 1 ) What had been the principal tactical and company changes launched by Welch at GE and inherited by Immelt?
2 . Why has the strategy, structure, and systems made by Welch at GE been and so successful, not only in delivering shareholder value during the 1980s and 1990s, but as well in making GE seemingly protegido to the demands breakup that have overwhelmed most other conglomerates? several. Can you discover a theory of administration or group of general rules that website link together Welch’s various pursuits? 4. About what extent will need to other huge, diversified companies imitate the management systems and management style produced by Welch at GE? a few.
What changes in strategy, organizational structure, and management devices and style will need to Jeff Immelt be putting into action in order to support and revive GE’s track record of superior efficiency? In particular, will need to GE consider breakup (like so many various other highly diversified companies)? 6th. What about GE’s strategy, structure and performance today? Material for the prep of the case-study (theoretical background)? Ghemawat S. (2006). Strategy and the Business Landscape. Pearson International Copy. Ch. a few and 6. Besanko M., Dranove M., Shanley M. (2004).
Economics of Technique, Wiley. Ch. 7. Materials specific to the case-study? 3rd there’s r. Grant (2003) Cases in Contemporary Technique 3rd impotence. Blackwell, Oxford. 4 Case 4 IKEA This case is approximately the types of competitive advantage and tactical fit. Top to bottom integration options and business of networks are at the core of operational success. However , proper positioning aiming at offering exceptional products or doing things differently can also be important to clarify sustained competitive advantage. Broad theoretical issues that must be considered when preparing this case:?
? How is it possible to reconcile effectiveness and product differentiation in a mature industry like household furniture retail? Beneath which situations a strategy centered on limited straight integration and long-term associations with companions allows a powerful control of the worth chain (or the value system) and environmentally friendly competitive edge? Specific concerns for the preparation in the case-study 1 . 2 . several. What elements account for the achievements of IKEA? What is the part of supply chain managing and the business of business network? What do you think of the company’s merchandise strategy and product range?
Do you agree with the matrix strategy described in Figure W of the case? In spite of its success, there are plenty of downsides to purchasing at IKEA. What are a few of these downsides? IKEA’s Vision Statement (in Physique C from the case) details how the organization seeks to generate a “partnership with its consumers. What do you think of this kind of vision statement? The fact that IKES hopes to have forty five stores in operation in the United States by 2013 is definitely an indication showing how optimistic the company is about the viability of its value proposition in this country. Do you consider IKEA is being overly upbeat in its growthplans?
How would you improve IKEA’s value proposition to make this even more attracting American customers? To achieve the sort of growth that IKEA is definitely hoping for, if the company change its item strategy? If so , in what way(s)? How about its item range-are there limitations towards the matrix strategy? Should the firm expand the product collection to include a lot more styles and price items? In what other ways should the business consider changing its products selection? If you had to predict, so what do you think IKEA’s value idea and merchandise lineup will look like in ten years?
Some industry observers possess suggested that IKEA should open a number of smaller, satellite stores across the United States (e. g., in shopping malls, deprive malls, and so forth ). By offering limited range of IKEA products, these “IKEA Lite outlets would presumably give customers who tend not to otherwise use a full-size IKEA the opportunity to have the brand. In addition , consumers who do live near significant IKEA could use these types of mini outlets to make minimal purchase (e. g., obtain a set of cups, as opposed to a complete living area set). Will you agree with this idea?
So why or really want to? 4. five. 6. 7. 8. Material for the preparation of the case-study (theoretical background)? Besanko D., Dranove D., Shanley M. (2004). Economics of Strategy, Wiley. Ch. five and 6.? M. Elizabeth. Porter. mil novecentos e noventa e seis. What is Approach. Harvard Business Review. November-December, 61-78. Materials specific to the case-study? Elizabeth. Baraldi. 08. Strategy in Industrial Networks: Experiences by IKEA. A bunch of states Management Assessment, 50(4). 5 Case a few Apple The case discusses the huge benefits and disadvantages of first-movers in markets characterized by network externalities.
The circumstances shows just how difficult can be gaining a sustainable competitive advantage and under which will circumstances a strong can regain a strong industry position after a period of decline. Broad theoretical issues that should be considered when preparing this case:? Which will strategies allow gaining a sustainable competitive advantage in industries completely outclassed by criteria and network externalities? How important are a firm’s resources and innovation and exactly how important is strategic placing? Under which in turn circumstances may a company prevent disruptive competition?
Under which circumstances can a company convert a competitive disadvantage into a competitive advantage? Specific questions for the preparation from the case-study???? Just how has the COMPUTER industry changed over the last 15 years and what are the implications pertaining to strategic placement? What were Apple’s causes of competitive advantage in the early years in the PC market? What are the main errors which in turn led Apple to a marginal market niche from this industry? Just how evaluate Apple’s strategies inside the 1990s? Just how did Apple’s strategy alter with the iPod/iTunes? Why the iPod/iTunes achievement has been beneficial to Apple’s PC business?
How do you see the future of Apple after Steve Careers? Material intended for the planning of the case-study (theoretical background)? Ghemawat S. (2006). Strategy and the Business Landscape. Pearson International Edition. Ch. a few.? Besanko D., Dranove D., Shanley Meters. (2004). Economics of Approach, Wiley. Ch. 14.? W. C. Betty and Mauborgne, R. 2004. Blue Water Strategy.
Harvard Business Assessment. October, 76-84. Material certain to this case-study Yoffie G., Slind Meters. (2007). Apple Computer, 06\, May 40, HBS Case #: 9-706-496. 6 PART II six Case 6th FDI in China FDI in China is a case about the good record ofthe People’s Republic of China and tiawan in getting foreign immediate investment (FDI) in the late twentieth century.
The goal of this case should be to analyze what has been good and potentially bad about the happening of FDI in China, and to consider the huge inflows of FDI primarily from your perspective of China’s domestic firms. Wide theoretical issues that must be considered when preparing this situatio:? Why perform firms acquire or build operations overseas instead of transferring and licensing out? What theoretical perspective(s) can clarify the nature and direction of FDIs? Just how can host countries attract even more FDIs?
Exactly what the benefits and costs of FDIs to a host region? Specific questions for the preparation of the case-study? Do China’s FDI policies and regulations progress in the right direction? What explains China’s attractiveness to foreign buyers? Why does fast economic development and large marketplace size catch the attention of FDIs? Exactly what the benefits linked to FDIs pertaining to the China economy? For what reason didn’t home-based firms enhance their investments at the same rate as foreign companies? Aren’t home-based firms’ incentives/ability to invest different? How does FDIs help state-owned enterprises?
May other countries replicate China’s experience? References for the preparation of the case-study (theoretical background) Slope C. Watts. L. (2009). International business, McGraw Hill, chapters several, 14. Sources specific to the case-study Huang, Y. (2003). FDI in China, June 2003. HBS case # 9-701-061. 8 Case six. BRL Sturdy: Globalizing an Australian Wine beverages Company The truth is presented around two key item launch decisions faced by simply Christopher Carson, Managing Director of BRL Hardy The european countries and Dorrie Millar, Taking care of Director with the parent company, BRL Hardy Limited, Australia’s second most significant wine maker.
The decisions made by these kinds of top managers will form not only the company’s future strategy but likewise the organization model and the administration approach it will adopt in its fast-growing global business. Extensive theoretical problems that must be regarded as when preparing the case:? What approaches can be applied to develop successful headquarters-subsidiary associations? What are the forces generating and constraining the need for cross-market coordination versus the imperative to get local market differentiation? Exactly what the main problems related to industry segmentation that managers in international business need to be aware about?
Specific inquiries for the preparation of the case-study? How do you account for BRL Hardy’s foreign success inside the wake in the merger of two market “dogs? What determined the strain between Stephen Davies and Christopher Carson? How effectively has Sam Millar handled their distinctions? If you have been in Sam Millar’s position, how you could have managed this tension? Might you have intervened? Should Mil agree to Carson’s proposal to launch D’istinto? What actions should Millar take regarding the competing plans for Banrock Station and Kelly’s Payback?
References pertaining to the preparation of the case-study (theoretical background) Hill C. W. L. (2009). Intercontinental business, McGraw Hill, chapters 12, 13, 17. Recommendations specific to this case-study Bartlett, C. A. (2003). BRL Hardy: Globalizing an Aussie Wine Company, October the year 2003. HBS case # 9-300-018. 9 Circumstance 8 CITY Cash & Carry The circumstance compares the entry strategies and detailed performance of German wholesaler Metro Money & Take (MCC) in three main emerging market segments: Russia, China, and India. After building up successful functions in Russian federation and China and tiawan, MCC had trouble to find a strategic positioning in India.
MCC’s experiences in the three countries highlight comparison in institutional context around emerging marketplaces and call awareness of the need for multinationals to tailor their country strategies. Extensive theoretical problems that must be considered when preparing this situatio:? Which personal, economic and social attributes make a foreign market more appealing? What are the main advantages and disadvantages associated with an early entrance into a overseas market? How to pick the most appropriate method of access? Specific inquiries for the preparation from the case-study?
What have been MCC’s key competitive advantages mainly because it has joined emerging market segments? What part did institutional context enjoy in challenging MCC’s attempts to confirm the value idea of its unique wholesaling structure and build itself as an accepted corporate and business citizen in Russia, India, and China and tiawan? After finding so much achievement in Russian federation and China and tiawan, why has MCC experienced such a slow begin in India? What challenges is the company have avoided in its India businesses? What very good moves did the company produce? Is there space for MCC to search partnerships in India? Is a joint venture off the table?
Just how would you think again about MCC’s way of strategic expansion and public relations in India going forward? Sources for the preparation in the case-study (theoretical background) Hillside C. Watts. L. (2009). International business, McGraw Slope, chapters 13, 14. Sources specific to this case-study Khanna, T., K. Palepu, C. A. Knoop, D. Isle (2007). City Cash & Carry, May 2007. HBS case # 9-707-505. 15 Case 9 Lamoiyan Corporation of the Korea: Challanging Multinational Giants An area Philippine toothpaste manufacturer, Lamoiyan Corp., faces the challenge of staying competitive against entrenched international giants.
The corporation has were able to capture, at its peak, twenty percent of the Philippine toothpaste marketplace and is just about the number three Philippine tooth paste producer, following Colgate-Palmolive and Unilever. Yet , competition will eventually intensify in the region as a result of reducing trade limitations, and Cecilio Petro, president of Lamoiyan Corp., needs to decide how to grow his company and keep it competitive. Going public, expanding route penetration, developing new products, and expanding internationally are all strategies Pedro looks at, but each move is usually costly and time consuming.
Pedro, an optimistic, committed entrepreneur, must assess the proper way to ensure Lamoiyan’s future achievement. Broad theoretical issues that should be considered while preparing this case? Competition in many industrial sectors prompt companies to adopt a transnational approach. What are the factors that such a technique involves? What are the difficulties that implementing this sort of a strategy creates? What are the primary issues associated with market segmentation that managers in foreign business need to be aware of? Exactly what are the charges strategies that managers in international business can successfully adopt?
Certain questions intended for the preparing of the case-study? How do you examine Lamoiyan’s admittance strategy inside the Philippine toothpaste market? For what reason didn’t Colgate and Unilever crush Lamoiyan earlier? What factor or perhaps factors do you think were the most important in traveling the hesitancy to respond? Is Lamoiyan’s achievement attributable to great strategy simply by Lamoiyan or bad technique by Colgate and Unilever? What areas of Cecilio Pedro’s strategy were most important in allowing Lamoiyan to survive and thrive?
How will you evaluate each one of the avenues of growth that Lamoiyan is pursuing (increased market transmission, expanding merchandise offerings, and international expansion)? Which option shows one of the most promise? Which option many concerns you? Are there generalizable lessons from your Lamoiyan case? References for the prep of the case-study (theoretical background) Hill C. W. D. (2009). International business, McGraw Hill, chapters 12, 17. References specific to this case-study Coughlan, P. J., L. L. Illes (2003). Lamoiyan Corporation of the Philippines: Challanging Multinational Titans, August 2003. HBS circumstance # 9-704-405. 11.
1
