Download now
Excerpt from Study Paper:
authorities believe community policing is a powerful and progressive law enforcement strategy, while others keep that the procedure has become obsolete in the 21st century and actually places officers’ lives in needless danger. To look for the facts, this kind of paper gives a review of the relevant peer-reviewed and scholarly materials concerning the success of community policing as of yet, including an analysis regarding what can be done to improve the chances that the innovation will certainly succeed and a discussion concerning what factors increase the chances of failure. Finally, a summary of the study and important findings regarding the success or failure of the community policing model are supplied in the summary.
Review and Discussion
There has been growing affinity for community policing programs considering that the 1980s, which includes neighborhood-oriented policing, community-oriented policing, and problem-oriented policing (Pfeifer, 2006). In accordance to Pfeifer, “Although these types of programs fluctuate in terms of all their approach, they have a tendency to share the most popular theme. That is, attempting to develop an effective functioning relationship between police as well as the community to find the detection and prevention of crime” (p. 22). More broadly, Gesualdi (2008) suggests that community policing comes with law enforcement, community involvement and community improvement, as well as a great overarching tenet that the avoidance of criminal offense is better than vigorous enforcement techniques. In this regard, Gesualdi adds that, “Community policing represents an organizational agreement that efforts to trigger the police office to focus on community problems as opposed to focusing on indications of problems” (2008, p. 72). This definition of community policing is consonant with the observation by Glensor and Maximum (1999) that community policing is “a proactive philosophy that promotes solving problems that are possibly criminal, impact the quality of life, or increase resident fear of criminal offenses. It requires identifying, analyzing, and dealing with community problems at all their source” (p. 15).
Most of the time, community policing initiatives indicate the overarching philosophy that police are generally not discrete and separate from the other law enforcement firms and organizations, but are alternatively part of a larger network of criminal rights system (Pfeifer, 2006). Even though the specific desired goals of community policing pursuits vary from legislation to legislation and every once in awhile, they all reveal the common aim of bringing the police and the community with each other to identify concerns and identify mutually reasonable approaches to resolving them (Paruch, 2009). Relating to Paruch, community policing is “also to obtain citizens engaged, to allow them to manage their neighborhoods and be effective participants in improving the standard of life in their communities” (p. 82).
In spite of the enormous amount of taxpayer resources devoted to community policing initiatives over the past 35 years or so, there remains some disagreement in the police community about the efficacy with the approach. Regarding this, Paruch (2009) reports that, “The philosophical shift coming from reactive to a proactive method of policing in the neighborhood has brought blended messages towards the police managers as well as from other own workers. It also elevated questions in the event community policing initiatives are working and if they must be continued” (p. 82). Actually Gesualdi (2008) argues that community policing
