Download now
Research from Article:
This could be translated as being a reaction to the void of globalization.
Finally, soccer represents a series of common values. The ad promotions promoted by major sports endorsements include transformed the game from a lawn practice to a global affair. Without a doubt, companies this kind of a Nike and Nike, the signs of American avenue culture are no longer prevented via offering sponsorship deals to the Chinese clubs, especially offered the fact that such companies are strong proponents of the Oriental and Indian economies, with factories and subsidiaries worldwide.
On the other hand, Appiah discusses thinking about globalization coming from a philosophical point-of-view. Therefore he states that there is a strong relationship among individuality since seen in the works of ancient philosophers and in the ones from Mill as well as the social framework that we are today (Appiah, 2007). More specifically, he does not consider a battle between style and each of our social needs. He is indeed an advocate of a cosmopolite world, yet from another type of perspective from that of Foer. Thus, whilst Foer argues globalization while an unavoidable fact, Appiah views that as a normal consequence as a approved event.
It is extremely difficult to claim on one viewpoints or another. Nevertheless , in terms of globalization, this can be viewed as having been inevitable. The two points-of-view, that of Foer and of Appiah can be viewed as becoming complementary. Indeed, the constant exchange of information, of communication led to this extraordinary expansion of the cosmopolite universe. At the same time although, in order to perceive these changes at the specific level, the entire notion of individuality changed. At the moment, the issue of identity, as Appiah talked about, must not take into account the distinction of race or perhaps skin color but rather that of the lining beliefs. Anybody can maintain its personality without rejecting the sociable nature of the human being. Man is, because so many philosophers argued, a sociable animal. This kind of however , will not determine the individuality but instead it finishes it. Soccer is from this point-of-view a connection link intended for billions of people throughout the world. They adhere to precisely the same values and norms of fair enjoy and competition, regardless of all their clear lower individuality.
The phenomenon of globalization can indeed resemble to that particular of the soccer phenomenon. What both Foer and Appiah argue is that regardless of the interpersonal nature of globalization and soccer, the issue of individuality is important and, with clear cases in mind, this really is maintained. Persons can value and treasure their person nature while at the same time being involved in a higher, even more socially directed global stand.
References
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. The ethics of personality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
Foer, Franklin. Just how Football Clarifies the World: An Unlikely Theory of Globalization.
