Download now
Research from Term Paper:
57). Although both clubs and operate groups are very similar, there are some situations in which one is better suitable than the other, and problems are talked about further below.
6.
Relative effectiveness of groups when compared with teams.
Although some authorities suggest that team and work organizations share a sufficient number of parallels to make them indistinguishable, there are several situations through which work groups may be far better if they are identified within particular categories (Biech, 2001). On this factor, Lewis (2001) reports a useful definition of team is definitely “a group of people who interact to achieve one common goal. Until they work together and work with each other, they can achieve the goal because it is too big for almost any one of them to accomplish individually” (p. 410). Though this standard definition can fit the majority of work organizations as well, there are several distinguishing characteristics involved. According to Kristof (1999), “The definition of job group may well range from a tiny group of quick coworkers to the identifiable subunit of an organization, such as a useful department or perhaps geographic division” (p. 2). Likewise, Galegher, Kraut and Egido (1990) report that, “A function group consists of coordinated work where the group members are, at a minimum, co-acting, and, more probably, definitely collaborating or perhaps cooperating with a or all the other members in the group” (p. 64). Therefore , a work group may be far better than a team if they are responsible for the capabilities described in Table you below.
Stand 1
Types of work groupings and their functions
Work Group Type
Description/Examples
Management/Administration
Groups in this category have decision-making, planning, policy-setting, and oversight responsibilities. These include corporate strategic planning offices, fiscal controllers’ offices, and personnel departments.
Professional (text-oriented)
“Text-oriented” groups are so designated because many tend to end up being conveyed with textual details. Legal offices, public relations offices, marketing departments, and the like, fall into this category.
Professional (technical)
These kind of groups tend to produce requirements, designs, formulations, models. Inside our study, this category included digital design departments, internal r and d departments, making quality assurance departments, etc .
Secretarial, clerical and technical support
Groups of this type present support solutions. Examples will be reservations and bookings office buildings, inventory control, and payroll offices.
Source: Olston, 99, p. 94
Conclusion
The research showed that because all organizations happen to be comprised of persons, understanding group dynamics is an important element in achieving organizational desired goals as well as for personal and professional growth. This kind of paper supplied a review of the peer-reviewed and scholarly literature to develop a much better understanding concerning the need to understand group aspect in the business globe as well as a discussion of the effectiveness of organizations and people in work conditions. An overview of group cohesiveness and its importance was accompanied by an research of the a result of social impact and connections on the decision-making process, in addition to a discussion of the importance of leaders in group settings. Finally, an analysis of the particular effectiveness of groups or teams was provided, which include examples of adjustments that were most appropriate for work groups when compared with teams.
Recommendations
Biech, Elizabeth. (2001). The Pfeiffer book of powerful team-building tools: Best of the annuals.
S . fransisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
Kristof, A. L. (1999). Person-organization fit: an integrative overview of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Workers Psychology, 49(10, 1-2.
Kruppa, R. Mass media, A. T. (2005). Group dynamics in the formation of the Phd cohort: a reflection in experiencing whilst learning company development theory.
Organization Development Journal, 23(1), 56-57.
Lewis, J. S. (2001). Project planning, scheduling, and control: A hands-on guide to taking projects in on time and on budget. New york city: McGraw-Hill.
Michaelson, L. K., Knight, A. B. Fink, L. Deb. (2002). Team-based learning:
