Hamlet is the most written about misfortune in the good man. However why is it a tragedy? Is it because Hamlet has a tragic flaw that creates his downfall? Or perhaps is it that every the cards are piled against him since the start of the play and no way he can prevail? In my opinion that it is a misfortune because of Hamlets tragic flaw. Hamlets tragic flaw is the fact he simply cannot act on impulse for things that require quick, decisive behavior, and that he serves on impulse for items that require more contemplation than is given by simply him.
Hamlet talks of his fathers tragic flaw that ultimately led him to his death, but it does apply equally well to him self:
So , oft it probabilities in particular men
That for a few vicious skin mole of character in all of them
As, within their birth, where they are simple
(Since character cannot choose his origin)
By the o’ergrowth of a lot of complexion
Oft breaking down the pales and forts of reason
Or by several habit so much o’er-leavens
The form of plausive mannersthat these men
Transporting, I say, the stamp of one defect
Being nature’s livery, or fortune’s star
Their particular virtues otherwise, be that they as genuine as elegance
Shall in the general peine take corruption
From that particular fault. The dram of evil
Doth all the noble substance of your doubt
Hamlet speaks in the one defect that is especially men from birth, plus the fact that that one defect is usually his particular fault. Hamlet says that the fault will certainly corrupt the person. It seems being an excuse coming from Shakespeare for why Hamlet will not do something about impulse. That he is offering the audience a hint that Hamlet has a tragic flaw. William shakespeare writes As, in their delivery, wherein they may be not guilty as well as (since nature cannot select his origin) (1. some. 26). Hamlet gives explanation of his own flaw here. Even though he is discussing his father having a tragic flaw, he states particular men (1. 4. 23), he is not denying that his personality does not have a tragic flaw. Hamlet is producing an excuse for any possible defects that might occur in the enjoy.
Shakespeare shows us that Hamlet retains his a chance to think lucidly and in depth with his monologue (3. 1 ) 56-89). Anytime that Hamlet has to make up to something, such as in the church when he gets the opportunity to kill Claudius when he was praying, He halts to think just before he works. There is no clear evidence of wrong doing right up until Claudius foi his sins to The almighty, his nephew, and the theater at large (Scott-Hopkins 1). The thinking at some point leads him to uncertainty, which leads him to inaction. He takes the time to purpose and factors himself out of performing. Hamlet echoes of his inability to adopt
Thus notion does produce cowards of us all
And thus the native color of resolution
Is usually sicklied oer with the paler cast of thought
And companies of great message and moment
With this view their currents turn bad
And lose the name of action. (3. 1 . 83-88)
Hamlet knows of his very own flaw and knows just how it has afflicted his marriage with Ophelia also.
Another example of when Hamlet cannot do something about impulse is act three or more, 2 if he puts on the play to attempt to show proof to the rest of the court that Claudius murdered his father. This individual could not make up to the spirits words by itself. It would had been easier if Hamlet would not alert Claudius to the fact that he knows who also murdered his father.
Hamlet acts without realistic thought within a couple of scenes throughout the enjoy. In Work 1, four Hamlet intends Horatio and Marcellus to leave him move so he can follow the ghosting. He does not have a rational considered it. This individual simply uses the ghost even with Horatio trying to discuss him from it.
One more example to compliment Hamlets illogical acts is definitely when he is in the Queens chambers in Action 3, 4 when he stabs Polonius throughout the arras, without knowledge of whom it is. When he listens to someone speak, What, ho! help! (3. 4. 22), Hamlet, with little thought, draws his sword and speaks Just how now, a rat? Deceased for a ducat, dead! (3. 4. 23-24) and stabs through the arras killing Polonius. It is this course of action, taken devoid of
thought, which usually ultimately finalizes Hamlets fortune.
Hamlet is a misfortune because Hamlet could have averted his own death. Hamlet had a large number of opportunities to eliminate Claudius, but did not take full advantage of them. This individual also experienced the option to see the public that his father died by Claudius side. Yet he did nor. He did neither because his tragic flaw retained him via achieving his goals. That may be until the end. In the end following he knows that his death is imminent and Claudius caused the death of his mother, this individual lets his anger overcome him. Hamlet kills Claudius in an impulsive act, as a result overcoming his own tragic flaw’ (GermanGirl2005 p. 1).
Shakespeare, Bill. Hamlet. The Norton Summary of Literature. Impotence. Peter Claire. New York: T. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1998.
Hamlets Tragic Flaw. Globe Papers. May. 2001.
. (Retrieved 14th May. 2001).
GermanGirl2005. Hamlets Tragic Downside. Planet Paperwork. May. 2001.
http://www.planetpapers.com/Assets/3304.html (Retrieved 14th Might. 2001).
Scott-Hopkins, Benjamin. Hamlet: Weakness or perhaps Justice?.
http://www.hamlet.org/hamlet_weakness_or_justice.html (Retrieved 14th May possibly. 2001).