Kant vs mill essay summary

Category: Works,
Topics: Little girl,
Published: 03.02.2020 | Words: 764 | Views: 338
Download now

J. Brady Grygrowski

Phil 205

Need help writing essays?
Free Essays
For only $5.90/page
Order Now


Paper three or more

The task that stands before me from this paper should be to address two situations and determine the ethical guidelines in which a person should work. The two philosophical approaches which i will analyze the situations with the Kantian and Functional point of view. Kant deciphers his ethical concerns by examining a persons motivation for executing an action regardless of the implications. A person who utilizes the Kantian view believes that the just pure very good is natural human explanation without outcomes. This natural human cause works without the influence of human feelings and desires. A truly great act as defined by Margen is performed as a result of an obligation for the categorical essential. The aims and personal daily activities of the individual executing the act must kept separate and distinct.

Utilitarism makes moral decisions based on the consequences with the action considered. Unlike the Kantian see the motives aren’t important only the consequences. The action is usually measured simply by how much happiness or unhappiness the action creates. The perfect ethical decision is the one that creates the most delight and the least amount of sadness. It nearly impossible to obtain different degrees of freedom as a person would have to experience all the different degrees of freedom to determine what degree of delight is better than the other.

Upon examining the thief who also stole through the millionaire Margen would examine the motives of the thief. The robber is taking for himself regardless of his situation. Regardless if his is poor and struggling. The thief is still furthering himself. The reasons intended for the robber stealing in the wealthy person doesnt matter. Stealing is usually against the widespread law that it can be wrong to steal from another individual. This relates to everyday life and decision-making situations, needs and wants happen to be thrown out the window. Any form of taking is wrong according to Kant.

This really is a strong argument because it stands firm for the reason that it is wrong to steal. Our company is in a culture that has regulations against stealing this retains order in society. The Kantian perspective does not waver despite the likely physical and emotional requirements of the robber. Kant will not make conditions for the poor and unlucky.

A person using the Utilitarian ethic code would go through the situation in that case examine the results of the actions taken. The millionaire doesnt have a clue which the money is fully gone. There are plenty of signals that the gentleman is robbing quality of life and material property are two for example. Due to this thieving the man has taken happiness to himself, his family, also to the community about him because they possess to support them. The weighty burdens of poverty and despair have already been vanquished. The burdens of oppression are availed as well as the family may rise in course and cultural status among all of their peers. The only downside is the fear of being uncovered. If the thief was found he may lose his freedom, assets, and value of his peers after the discovery of his treachery. But if the robber remained undocumented he made everybody more happy. By being a sufficient, integral member of society he’s making every person happier.

This analysis is usually favoring the thief, stealing is certainly not looked upon as a bad deed. People acquire jailed, performed, or have parts of the body removed for theft but in the functional view he gets away with that as long as he could be not found out. The adverse part of this analysis is the fact one has to steal from one other human being to be joyful and powerful. Is there a condition where stealing is justified?

The next situation handles a little girl who is to her perishing father that she will not really marry anyone that has a different religious holding. The Kantian view might first look at the motives of the little girl for lying to her perishing father. Simply by lying to her father the woman is trying to relieve the suffering her father will go through simply by denying his final would like. She is comforting him in the final hours on earth. By lying to her dad she is giving him happiness and trying to relieve herself of the sense of guilt associated with her