Circumstance name, quotation, and court: Ashley Region, Arkansas versus.
Pfizer, Incorporation, 552 N. 3d 659 (8th Cir. 2009) Synopsis of Key Facts: An ingredient traditionally used in Pfizer’s products is actually a necessary ingredient in the manufacturing of methamphetamine in small toxic labs which are in charge of dangerous explosions, burns, and toxic gases. Arkansas has one of the largest numbers of small toxic labs in the US and is burdened with high costs of fighting the meth outbreak and is wanting to recoup some of the funds that the counties of Arkansas include spent.
The matter: Is Pfizer ethically in charge of assisting inside the funding of fighting the meth pandemic? The Possessing: Since Pfizer is a key manufacturer of goods containing required ingredients utilized in illegal meth labs as well as the counties of Arkansas has been so intensely financially mired by these labs, the damages will be obvious. The counties possess suffered monetary loss via battling a drug that may not be produced without the substances in Pfizer’s products.
Due to these damages and Pfizer’s position in the availability of ingredients to drug labs, it is the responsibility of Pfizer to possibly, repay the counties and finance the near future costs of fighting the meth outbreak or discover alternative materials to use in many that may not be used in the manufacture of meth. Summary of Your Thinking: It is the company responsibility of Pfizer to assist in financing the counties’ operations combating meth. Under a corporate citizenship view, Pfizer is responsible for contributing to the solution with the social issue that their products create.
Meth is a great epidemic rapidly sweeping the nation and it is the obligation of any individual, or organization, with virtually any tie to the drug at all, to contribute to the solution, the same amount that they contribute to the problem.