Download now
Research from Essay:
Highway to Guantanamo
The docudrama, the Road to Guantanamo, the 2006 film by Shiny Whitecross and Michael Winterbottom provided an exclusive look at the difficulties and issues of improving international cooperation. This thrilling tale of the now well-known “Tipton Three” British guys of Pakistaner and Bangladeshi origin who, through a combination of poor decision-making and infractions of worldwide law, allows the viewers to examine these kinds of modern concerns using the battle with terrorism as a means of informing the story. The purpose of this article is to take a look at this film and emphasize five separate violations of international cooperation using the content of the Geneva Conventions plus the Universal Statement of Human being Rights being a guide and authority in the discussion.
The first infringement of intercontinental cooperation is usually evident at the outset of the film. The film is going on under the circumstances at the beginning of the war on dread in 2001. The actions taken by the us military and the actual bombing campaigns against Afghanistan violates the Geneva Convention, since innocent individuals are callously murdered simply by American jets not specific between civilian and combatant as stated in these strong articles. This violation does give us the basic to analyze the argument with increased examples. Due to this bombing raids, these 3 men on the private endeavor are removed by power after living through one of these problems. Here america now does various other violations of the Geneva Conference and the General Declaration of Human Rights.
The preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights explains and reinforces the inalienable privileges of every living human. The 30 content that clearly give this document the authority to suggest an implied meaningful behavior includes the true man spirit and should be reinforced and optimistic by everybody. This second example expresses the wholeness of war and all of it is initiators since guilty of breaking the very importance of this proposal. Understanding the philosophy to which these bombing raids are relevant to suggest that payback and assault is the right response to virtually any form of intimidation. The horrible events of September 11, 2011, and the eventual alterations these situations would push, do not excuse the retaliation methods exhibited then and now in any legal sense.
These types of three males, guilty of zero crime, will be eventually extradited to Guantanamo Bay Barrica to be placed for asking and consequence as an enemy combatant. In zero shape or form are these men combatants and no you can have a legal authority professing they are. Data was by no means presented why they were selected for this treatment, clearly violating many content within the statement, but especially article 10 where because of process and official charge are required to mandate such activities. An argument could be made that the violates article 8 as well. Article almost eight states that everyone has the justification to an effective conseil, and in the strategy demonstrated a Guantanamo Bay clearly will not resemble self-confidence or efficiency.
The Geneva Convention articles or blog posts were made at the end of World War II in order to remember the horrible crimes committed within this brutal campaign. Innocent lives were dropped during this time simply by various ways which include concentration camps and by nuclear weaponry. Decades of different ethnic groups were wiped out all over the world in different promotions. It seems that these lessons have been ignored in this
