The play Agamemnon involves various characters who have introduce and contribute toward some of the main themes in the play, including justice and revenge. Even though the play is definitely dominated simply by Clytaemnestra plus the Chorus, were introduced to diverse angles inside the story simply by minor heroes, such as Cassandra and the Herald. The selection of personas plays a large role in Aeschylus’ drama, as they supply the audience with multiple views on the concepts central towards the plot. With the introduction of each and every new character, new way of doing something is brought about, departing the audience with an understanding which the characters have different opinions of or information about the events that take place through the entire play. The play is lacking in on-stage actions, but keeps the audience’s interest simply by allowing viewers members to interpret every character’s opinions. The difference in perspectives adds depth with each character and dramatic curiosity to the enjoy, and complexness and range to the prominent themes.
Early inside the play, we all learn there is a difference in the characters philosophy with regard to proper rights and vengeance. When the sacrifice of Iphigenia is talked about, we can see that there is a difference in perspectives among Agamemnon and Clytaemnestra, providing the audience with insight for the nature of both character types. Agamemnon is convinced that the sacrifice was performed as an act of justice, nevertheless Clytaemnestra will not agree. Agamemnon committed the act in order to appease the God of nature, Artemis, who lose interest a grudge after the Danaans’ army acquired killed a hare. After killing the pet, the military services faces good winds, which in turn stops their voyage on the city of Troy. Thus, Iphigenia was sacrificed to conciliate the god. The controversy over whether this was a suitable act is definitely between Agamemnon and Clytaemnestra, scarcely including Cassandra. Inside the play, we come across that Agamemnon placed responsibility above relatives. He explains that his heart will be heavy, regardless of whether or certainly not he eliminates his child, but in the finish he felt that this individual could not be a traitor to his fast. His work was performed in the name of proper rights, but concurrently follows the normal Greek belief, that “Learning comes through suffering”. Using this ideology, we can bring up how Agamemnon felt the fact that suffering he’d face, coming from having lost his little girl, would allow him to repent the desprovisto of distressing Artemis. In comparison, Clytaemnestra thinks that the killing was an act of murder – not a sacrificial procedure. She claims that Iphigenia “did not deserve” to be betrayed. Clytaemnestra specifically conveys her lack of arrangement when the lady claims that it can be Agamemnon who have deserves to suffer, if you are willing to commit the take action. Here, the difference between the characters’ perspectives is definitely evident.
Additionally , Cassandra adds an extremely interesting point of view to the play by getting the theme of family, and relating this theme to matters of justice. Your woman states that Clytaemnestra “shares” Agamemnon’s guilt for his murder, since she himself commits killing against a family member – her husband. Cassandra’s role ironically demonstrates a good idea that the Greeks believed: “Revealed to that man’s descendants / Is the cost for recklessness”. The correlation between this belief and Cassandra’s assertion shows just how that serves of nasty can affect the complete family. This kind of idea strongly follows the theme of payback in the perform, for example , while seen in the murder of Thyestes’ kids. The sacrifice of Iphigenia allowed Clytaemnestra to believe that she necessary to act against her spouse. Each function affects the family overall. Cassandra highlights this idea by prophesizing that Agamemnon’s son can seek payback. Cassandra permits the audience to know that vengeance and relatives are strongly tied. Considering the different perspectives presented here regarding the death of Iphigenia, the audience must decide which figure to support. The disagreement likewise touches after the difference between societal classes. Throughout the enjoy, the audience is usually exposed to the differing honn�te of vips and the common people, and this divergence adds to the dramatic intensity in the play.
We can even more see a difference in viewpoints over the concept of the justice later in the perform, when the Refrain speculates if Clytaemnestra’s action of killing was in the name of her girl or intended for power. The queen believes that the killing has done her daughter rights, and therefore was a necessary take action, but the Chorus does not acknowledge. After the Queen confesses her crime, consider that her “mind can be unhinged”, and in addition they weep for King. They can be appalled by simply Clytaemnestra’s activities, but likewise believe that Agamemnon’s death provides justice pertaining to the children of Thyestes, who also died as a result of Agamemnon’s dad. This realisation surprises the group, as they may well have only been worried about bringing Iphigenia justice. The Chorus acknowledges that while Clytaemnestra’s actions were shocking and deserved retribution, they well-balanced the “scales of justice” for another incident. The representation of proper rights in the range, “Justice tilts against those who find themselves to learn / By suffering” allows the group to visualise a size with justice and suffering on opposite sides. If we compare this with the Chorus’ opinion, we could assume that the Chorus feels that Clytaemnestra has well-balanced the weighing scales of rights – through Agamemnon’s battling, the children that Atreus murdered were avenged. On the other hand, the Chorus likewise suggests that the suffering is not more than, and that the California king is however to pay for her mistakes. Now, it is clear that Clytaemnestra is certainly not bothered about the words from the old men of Argos, since she feels that she has done her work. Here, the in points of views gives us insight within the characters philosophy and Ancient greek culture.
In the perform, Cassandra not simply reiterates the theme of vengeance, by repeating the events that contain already occurred, but she also foreshadows the revenge that is certainly yet to come. In her short appearance onstage, Cassandra recollects all the incidents that have taken place in the name of rights and vengeance, from the abduction of Sue, to her very own death. The girl claims to be familiar with the age-old wrongdoings that contain taken place in the castle, reminding the audience that revenge and justice took their toll on multiple characters. Just before her fatality, Cassandra prophesized that a person will come to Argos and “seal these killings” with the intention of family, again focusing on the partnership between revenge and relatives lines. This hint can be intriguing and ambiguous to the audience, turning their focus towards that will return and what activities they will consider.
Through multiple personas, the audience is exposed to diverse forms of justice, such as the contact form which is treated by the gods. The different varieties add variety to the concept of the justice. Cassandra’s character tells the Refrain that the lady possessed the gift of prophecy prior to deceiving Apollo. She then explains that after her offence, the god made it in order that people would no longer believe her prophecies. Thus, we see that Cassandra believes which the curse was obviously a punishment on her behalf actions – an take action of both revenge or perhaps justice. Since the gods keep the highest positions of electrical power, it is only suitable for them to reprimand those who trick them. The Chorus as well participates in communicating this message, simply by often trying to the the almighty, Zeus, to consider decisions. This kind of mentality is apparent at the beginning of the play, if the members of the Chorus suggest that it was Zeus who was shocked by the kidnapping of Helen, and he who “sends the sons of Atreus after Paris”. We later on witness one more character, the Herald, declare that Zeus finally “brings justice” in the struggle between the siblings and Paris. In the course of the plays action, we can see which the gods are seen as well known figures with the highest power, and they are noticed treating everybody equally, whether or not a ruler or common man, as “Wealth is not a safeguard”. In Agamemnon, spectators must understand the relationship between your gods plus the people when it comes to the way that justice can be dealt. Through all the numerous characters views, nobody concerns the gods, but rather everybody accepts them and feels them to be fair. Not only does this highlights the hyperlink between the Gods and the rights system, nevertheless also the understanding between the mortals plus the gods.
The various views that are introduced in Agamemnon are useful, especially for highlighting the themes of justice and revenge. Different opinions provided by each figure add interesting depth to the topics by which includes other relevant themes, including family, esteem, and authority. A variety of suggestions about these significant motifs support give the target audience an idea with the mentality of each and every of the personas, creating a relationship between the market and the character types. Aeschylus is using multiple views to add variety to styles, thus adding complexity for the play by simply including inconsistant ideas and giving character types remarkable depth.
Works Quoted From: Aeschylus, and Philip Para May. Agamemnon. Ed. David Harrison and Judith Affleck. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP, 2003. Produce.