Object contact theory development of term

Category: Theories,
Published: 09.03.2020 | Words: 968 | Views: 353
Download now

Countertransference, Allen Bundy, Borderline Personality Disorder, Psychoanalytic Theory

Excerpt from Term Conventional paper:

Presentation itself offers several levels, corresponding to the beginning phase of remedy. During meaning, patient and therapist job to understand the nature of the person’s disturbed object relationships by the “unconscious connotations of their patterns in their transferential relationship together with the therapist” (McGinn, 1998, s. 192) the first stage of interpretation is a time for exploration and free affiliation; at this point, the sufferer is revealing and the specialist is making the symbolism of those movement in terms of thing relations. This is followed by a great “empathic confrontation, ” where the therapist gently guides the patient’s maladaptive unconscious thing relations into consciousness. As soon as the patient is definitely conscious of his behaviors, the ultimate phase of interpretation may take place, to create a “genetic interpretation” (McGinn, 1998, l. 192). This is how the therapist “uses his interpretations from the current romantic relationship between him self and the patient and links it to unconscious symbolism from the person’s past” (McGinn, 1998, g. 192). The objective of interpretation should be to provide the history and understanding necessary for successful transference job.

Need help writing essays?
Free Essays
For only $5.90/page
Order Now

The present marriage between therapist and patient is the basis for a second technique common to or therapy – transference analysis – corresponding roughly to the central stage of therapy. The assumption is that all sufferers will begin to “transfer” pathological relationship patterns (object relations) using their past on the specialist, allowing the therapist to analyze what is not on track outside of remedy based on what occurs in-session (McGinn, 1998). This is to some degree overlapping with interpretation, although at this point the therapist should gradually undertake a stable position as a “good-object” for the individual. Then, employing his before interpretation, the therapist may tie the patient’s symptoms and treatment goals to a single or more overriding themes of abnormal relating (McGinn, 1998). The trustworthy, good-object stance of the therapist will then allow patient and therapist to get these abnormal behavior patterns into mind, where they will hopefully end up being redefined and reworked in healthier object relations throughout the final phases of remedy.

The part of the therapist

The role of the or perhaps therapist is different from traditional psychoanalysts for the reason that he is expected to show a diploma of sympathy for the patient’s upsetting past and dysfunctional habits of relating. The patient is probably very anxious, on a old fashioned level, of bringing his “split-off” target relations in consciousness in which they can be confronted and altered; the therapist needs to be delicate and understanding in order to help successful transference and mindful integration with the self. Additionally , the or perhaps therapist need to work to hold his individual countertransference thoughts (the reactions and thoughts he experiences as a result of becoming the target with the patient’s transference), conscious and check (McGinn, 1998). If the therapist does not successfully maintain his posture as an objective, neutral transference object, he may become yet another “all-bad” subject relation to the individual, and restorative efforts will probably be thwarted.

Finally, as mentioned earlier, the therapist must be trained in recognizing the answering appropriately to the various primitive defense mechanisms someone will display, such as discharge, introjection, breaking, dissociation, etc . The therapist must act as a guide, guiding carefully around complex and counterproductive defense mechanisms, in order to take the patient to a point in which he can see the truth behind his disorder resulting from personal perception (Murdock, 2009).

Personal expression

I believe this model of therapeutic treatment, based upon or theory, will be a fantastic fit to get my strategies to work with adults with axis-two personality disorders. I personally find the object relations paradigm of the development of the self to be highly understandable and applicable to any type of personality disorder. In particular, I agree with Otto Kernberg’s take on the very challenging to treat termes conseillés patient, when it comes to those patients’ severe breaking between great people and bad persons, and in the borderline sufferer being “stuck” in an premature, black and white colored, paranoid-schizoid point-of-view.

The challenges I encounter will connect with all patients with individuality disorders. In very general terms, I will be dealing with individuals who not simply initially observe me and treat me personally as “all-bad” or “all-good, ” although who are very skilled in manipulating others to act and react in ways that they find familiar. I will must be very aware at all times of these defense mechanisms, to make sure that I react appropriately and helpfully. For example , a patient who may have internalized damaging tendencies by a parent might in turn “attribute those mistreating tendencies for the therapist and unconsciously provoke in the therapist such damaging feelings toward them (McGinn, 1998, l. 192). This can happen in very refined and sly ways, specifically with selected personality disordered individuals, thus i will have to continue to be vigilant. Neutrality and accord will not regularly be easy, but are critical to my success as a therapist.


Buckley, P. (1996). An Object Relations Perspective on the Nature of Resistance and Therapeutic Change. American Log of Psychotherapy, 50 (1), 45+.

Buckley, P. (1994). Self-Psychology, Target Relations Theory and Supporting Psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, forty eight (4), 519+.

Knight, Z .. (2006). A lot of Thoughts on the Psychological Root base of the Tendencies of Serial Killers since Narcissists: an Object Relations Perspective. Social Habit and Persona, 34 (10), 1189+.

McGinn, L. (1998). Interview: Otto F. Kernberg, M. D., F. A. P. A., Developer of Object Relationships Psychoanalytic Therapy for Termes conseillés Personality