Download now
Excerpt from Exploration Paper:
For the past a number of decades the emphasis in policing has been building rely upon the community. Making the pavements safe for all requires common cooperation between general public and the police. Without community support, the police simply cannot do it alone. In this regard, esteem as been shown to be a better tool to get decreasing crime than fear and when fear is present residents tend to steer clear of contact with community police officials and other federal government officials the residents believe may check on their migration status or the status of family members. Info from these types of groups relating to criminal actions in their community is non-existent. Respect between law enforcement and community users is far more favorable to developing a good and lawful environment and regarding local authorities in immigration enforcement creates a great aura of fear. Auras that even the best police will have problems overcoming.
The process of racial profiling not only causes problems for law enforcement in enforcing the laws it also serves as a great infringement around the civil legal rights of the profiling victims. Staying stopped and frisked centered solely because of one’s competition or racial may be considered only a minor annoyance when it this kind of minor irritation is inclined to a specific race or ethnicity it must be thought to be a breach of the profiled victim’s equal protection rights. Members of racial and ethnic organizations have the right to expect to end up being treated like all other teams and when profiling is used by police this expectation is violated.
In several states and communities legal guidelines has been exceeded that forbids the use of ethnicity profiling by way of a law enforcement organizations. In several others, however , remarkably Arizona and Alabama, the practice continues to be actually encouraged. This has resulted in debate and uneasiness ultimately causing increased levels of prejudice and resentment.
The Arizona statute that nearly mandates ethnic profiling is actually a classic sort of the problems the process creates. The Az statute needs police officers to ask about the migrants status of anyone there is a reasonable mistrust may be within the country unlawfully. The Arizona legislature, very likely in a reaction to the public invective caused by the statute necessitating the migrants inquiry, exceeded legislation prohibiting any law enforcement action depending on race or ethnicity, yet said laws has had little effect. Instead, the Illinois law enforcement companies have extended to physical exercise their specialist under the other statute. What has efficiently happened is the fact Arizona legal authorities are being asked to impose a regulation that steps on the civil rights of everyone in Illinois that is Mexican or even slightly appears to be Hispanic. Regardless if one’s family has lived in america one day or perhaps three decades he or she is controlled by the same amount of suspicion. Residing in Arizona and being Hispanic now means being usually subject to feasible stop or perhaps questioning. The privilege of anonymity so longer cherished by most Americans can be forever dropped for Arizonian Hispanics or persons who also look Mexican. Unfortunately, Arizona ( az ) appears to be only the first state considering these kinds of a posture. Reportedly a number of other states are looking at the achievement of comparable type legislation (Weigel, 2010). This is a result that will be a tragedy for the Hispanic community especially and the Usa society on the whole.
Racial profiling is a social practice that is certainly repressive and undemocratic in nature. By using group characteristics and can be applied it to individual ethnicity and ethnic minorities. In recent times this process has been used thoroughly against the Mexican and Mexican-American communities in the United States. Its use has been accustomed to impute bad behavior for an entire population of people and caused these to be be subject to suspicion-based entirely on their cultural heritage.
The entire process of ethnic profiling is usually unjust however not surprisingly, it can be applied against those in society the majority of vulnerable to assault and least likely to effectuate any politics or cultural pressure in order to avoid its observance. In the case of the Hispanic and Mexican-American neighborhoods they are at this time, as they were in throughout the Great Depression, getting used as method to obtain blame for by least section of the struggling U. S. overall economy. Racial profiling serves to reinforce this blaming process by associating deviant behavior which has a population group. Because all their behavior is labeled as deviant treating them unfairly through profiling is less bothersome.
The entire profiling process is founded on the wrongly diagnosed belief that Mexican-Americans happen to be drug smugglers or unrecorded aliens (Aguirre, 2004). This belief causes damage to the reputation of all Mexican-Americans and Hispanics since the belief the natural way extends to anyone who appears to be Mexican-American. Profiling successfully results in denying Mexican-Americans a chance to fully participate in the activities of their community in that it subordinates their position. Profiling product labels Mexican-Americans and Hispanic because deviant and forces these to live their lives in a style that pushes them to guard themselves against false images. Such a life marginalizes them since Americans. Their very own lives are only a portion of what they must be.
Profiling, no matter its apparently good motives, has offered to perpetuate bigotry and prejudice in the united states. It serves to diminish any kind of progress that has been made toward achieving racial and cultural equality and it ruins the any kind of claim that there is equal security under the law for all Us citizens. It sustains a famille system and sends a communication to the remaining portion of the world the fact that United States fails to live by its ideals. With the use of profiling now to overcome terrorism there is certainly even less concern among the list of general public the use of profiling should be forbidden. Proponents from the use of profiling cite polls that show the general public’s support for profiling as a method of police but such support was also present in the profound South during the days of segregation. It was not really called profiling in those days but the effect was the same. It was a little while until years of city disobedience to overcome the legal enforcement and effects of segregation and, if profiling is permitted to continue, a similar approach will be necessary to overcome the effects of profiling.
White Americans do not believe that profiling affects them and so there is no well-known outrage against its make use of. Fear is the instrument generating its use and because it is being used against minorities also powerless to effectively object and advocates say this can be a small cost to spend. What these kinds of proponents fail to realize is the fact it makes every person of Hispanic ancestry a thought criminal and it perpetuates stereotypes.
Profiling in the United States has to be stopped. It tears with the very framework of the American system of rights and restore attitudes concerning minorities that American contemporary society has worked hard and long to get rid of. Being the member of a minority must not automatically place one in the position of being a suspected lawbreaker and that it can be precisely what profiling does. The freedom to walk down the street in the us free from fear of being halted, frisked, or perhaps questioned should be available to everyone. Presently it is not the case plus the fact that profiling is in order to be used in different form can be described as black draw on the heart and soul of all People in the usa.
Bibliography
Aguirre, A. (2004). Profiling Mexican-American Identity: Concerns and Problems. The American Behavioral Scientist, 928-942.
Friedersdorf, C. (2010, May 18). The Best Circumstance Against Arizona’s Immigration Legislation: The Experience of Better Phoenix. Gathered June six, 2011, from The Atlantic: http://www.theatlantic.com/special-report/the-future-of-the-city/archive/2010/05/the-best-case-against-arizonas-immigration-law-the-experience-of-greater-phoenix/56859/
Harris, D. (2010, 06 17). Ending Racial Profiling: Necessary for Open public Safety as well as the Protection of Civil Rights. (U. T. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee)
Jadallah, D. (2010). State Electricity and the Metabolism of the Individual: Ethnic Profiling of Arab-Americans. Arabic Studies Quarterly, 218-237.
Ngai, M. (2004). Impossible Themes: Illegal Aliens and the Producing of Modern America. Princeton, NJ-NEW JERSEY: Princeton School Press.
Rudovsky, D. (2002). Breaking the design of ethnic profiling. Tiral, 29-36.
U. S. Doj. (2003, Nov 1). Simplifié of Federal government Justice Stats, 2001. Retrieved June several, 2011, via Bureau of Justice Figures: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetailiid=599
Weigel, D. (2010, April 29). Arizona Rules Inspires Copycats
