Richard nixon speech in vietnam document critique

Category: Persons,
Topics: Chief executive,
Published: 30.03.2020 | Words: 624 | Views: 537
Download now

Cambodia, Vietnam, Speech, Vietnam War

Research from Content Critique:

(“Cambodia and Laos, inches n. g. )

Need help writing essays?
Free Essays
For only $5.90/page
Order Now

Then simply, when Nixon begins speaking about peace transactions with the North, is when he is providing a glimpse into a shift in strategy. In which, the U. S. may play China and the Soviet Union against one other. This is important mainly because, American forces were restricted from executing air happens in the North. The ability to move an bijou with China allowed Nixon to begin bombing Hanoi. This can be significant for the reason that Christmas bombings of Hanoi (in 1972) were arguably one aspect that helped pushed the North Thai to indication the Paris Peace Treaty of 1973. (“Linebacker II Bombing Raids, ” in. d. )

In one aspect, Nixon is proper in that the continuing future of his technique will bring the North Japanese to the negotiating table. However , the North would not give up on their goals for a specific Vietnam, as they would delay until Nixon was not a longer in power. At which point, they would check the new Chief executive and Congress’ resolve to get renewing the war once more. What all this shows, would be that the arguments of Nixon were correct in the short-term. But, in the moderate to long-term, the different activities that were urged by Nixon only manufactured the situation a whole lot worse.

Clearly, the various arguments of Richard Nixon during this talk were built to sway the opinions from the American community in support of such policies. In the short-term the different arguments that have been made by Nixon were audio, as they could help reduce the NVA’s capability to wage war and enable for a reduction of American causes. However , the medium to long-term significance meant that the war could escalate. Where, Vietnam’s friends and neighbors would quickly become engulfed in civil wars. This would bring about the genocide that took place in Cambodia throughout the 1970’s. Then simply, when Nixon is declaring his aspirations for a stop fire and a serenity treaty, he could be indicating that he will probably use a similar policy for forcing a negotiated peacefulness with the North. The problem with such considering is that, this may bring about a peace treaty and allow American forces to withdraw from your country. Yet , this would not bring a long-lasting peace since the North would wait for a day when ever Nixon is usually not President. At which point, they would renew the war again. This is what makes the policy techniques that the Chief executive was performing over the method to long term as failures. Where, the escalation in the war will do tiny if everything to bring about long-term peace. Instead, a lasting tranquility was achieved when; nor President Kia nor Congress had a aspire to renew the war, when the North would reinvade the South in 1975. That is why the different quarrels made by Nixon are correct over the immediate, but disastrous over the long-term. It is through examining the several ideas presented in the conversation in this light; that provides the greatest insights in regards to what policy decisions shaped the results of the Vietnam War.


Address to the Nation in Vietnam. (1971, April 7). Retrieved 04 11, 2010 from American Rhetoric internet site:

Cambodia and Laos. (n. g. ). Retrieved April eleven, 2010 via Spartacus website:

Linebacker II Bombing Raids. (n. d. ). Retrieved April 11, 2010 from Centennial Off Trip website: