Download now
Excerpt by Research Paper:
S. citizens. This can be a popular argument offered by similar sex relationship movement in fact it is one that is definitely compelling.
For several years homosexuality was considered against the law behavior in most jurisdictions in the United States but the majority of such code have been eliminated and so gays and lesbians are now complete citizens who have the right to expect full legal rights of citizenship. This means that what ever one’s honest or meaningful standards might be does not mean that such requirements must be stated in the laws and regulations. Many Americans object morally and ethically to the display of pornography; the publishing of songs with colorful words; and, effective books and magazines yet each of these cases is shielded by the 1st Amendment and the rights of gays and lesbians to marry should certainly enjoy the same protection.
The proponents of virtue integrity are not exclusively in their support of same sex marital life. Followers of ethical relativism will advocate too that gays and lesbians should be liberal to choose their particular course of action in regard to marriage. Meaningful relativists think that there is no general moral truth. What is right for one individual may not necessarily be right for somebody else. They believe strongly that nobody has the right to interfere inside the choices of others. Similarly, advocates of the honest egoism placement would also advocate for the right of gays(i think they are sick) and lesbians to marry. This theory of values advocates that every individual must do what is perfect for his or her own self-interest so a person determining if to enter to a same sex union must be free to carry out if they believe it is within their own self-interest.
As suggested earlier, a defieicency of same sexual intercourse marriage can be not an easy one. There are compelling arguments on both sides of the issue but , regardless of the position you can take ethically on the concern, the fact remains that gays(i think they are sick) and lesbians are citizens and as people are entitled to the full range of privileges that other citizens enjoy. The right to marry is a right that all heterosexuals enjoy and the same legal rights should be prolonged to all gays(i think they are sick) and lesbians. The issue is not an ethical or meaning one. It truly is question of fundamental right and it is incumbent on the specific states to begin with granting the ideal. Despite the arguments of the many groupings who go against sb/sth ? disobey the extension with this right to gays(i think they are sick) and lesbians, it is a couple of basic fairness and the style of exclusion that has existed in the United States with this issue should be abolished. Like the banning of interracial matrimony before that, legislation needs to be universally enacted legalizing same sex relationship.
References
Corvino, J. (1999). Same Sexual: Debating the Ethics, Scientific research, and Culture of Homosexuality (Studies in Social, Politics, and Legal Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefiedl Publishers.
Koppelman, A. (2001). For the Moral Fundamentals of Legal Expressivism. Baltimore Law Assessment, 777-784.
Lewin, E. (2004). Does Matrimony have an upcoming? Journal of Marriage
