Download now
“Even a feeble-minded man wants to be like additional men, ” writes Charlie Gordon, the narrator of Daniel Keyes’ novel Blossoms for Algernon. (Keyes, 184) This new is known because of its apparent esteem and understanding of mentally disabled people. But , as Brent Walter Cline points out in his article “You’re Not the Same Sort of Person: The Evolution of Pity to Horror in Daniel Keyes’ Flowers pertaining to Algernon”, the novel truly treats mental handicaps while massively devaluing to a person. While some from the plotlines and character relationships help readers start to find mentally disabled people while valuable, addititionally there is endless adverse language accustomed to describe mental disability. Although Flowers for Algernon can be praised pertaining to treating emotionally handicapped since complex, the constant and solid negative terminology used to illustrate mental handicaps ultimately leaves the reader feeling otherwise.
The experts who use Charlie in their experiment are definitely the most obvious example of using embarrassing language to spell out retarded Charlie. To these scientists, Charlie Gordon is a evaluation subject initially, and a human being second. Specifically after the operation, the team of scientists hold very little respect for handicapped Charlie. This kind of disrespect pinnacles at a scientific conference where Charlie and Algernon are exhibited as nothing more than the team’s creation. Doctor Strauss, a neurosurgeon and psychiatrist, identifies preoperative Charlie as “dull” and having “vacuous facial expression(s)”. (Keyes 147) Right after, Doctor Nemur, the head with the experiment, reads private and embarrassing excerpts from Charlie’s progress information. The audience laughs, disregarding Charlie’s presence entirely. Immediately following is perhaps the most upsetting quote in the novel- “‘We () have the pleasure of learning we have taken one of nature’s mistakes and () developed superior human being. () It could be said that Steve Gordon would not really are present before this experiment¦'” (Keyes 148) Charlie’s retardation can be described as a mistake, which should be altered by science in order to become worthwhile. These actions, these kinds of words used in treatment of preoperative Charlie are immensely fresh, and they are prevalent throughout the story. These instances of mistreatment usually are meant to draw sympathy for Charlie. Readers are made to see his mistreatment since disgusting, tragic even. But they are too frequent and without enough opposition appearing truly incorrect. These good examples wear for the reader’s psych until such mistreatment is expected.
The most psychologically intense circumstance of handicap shaming is found in Charlie’s family members, specifically his mother Increased. She is a set, simple-minded girl who cares too much as to what the friends and neighbors think. Consequently, the presence of a developmentally handicapped son in her a lot more unbearable. Since Charlie’s father and mother prepare to get him to yet another doctor who claims to be able to help to make Charlie clever, Charlie’s daddy Matt inquiries the physician’s credibility. Reacting, Rose seems to lose control- “‘Don’t say that, ‘ she screeches. ‘Don’t show me there’s nothing they can do. ‘ She holds Charlie and presses his head against her mama. ‘He’s likely to be regular, whatever we need to do, whatsoever it costs. ‘” (Keyes 125) The keywords below and “normal” and “whatever it costs”. In Rose’s mind, he can never become normal until he’s smart, despite the fact that he can very typical within the human population of retarded people. Below Rose demonstrates to her, possibly an reasonless amount of money, time, energy, and emotional annoyed would be worth having a “normal” son. From this quote and other instances throughout the novel, Charlie’s family contains shame, discomfort, and even humiliation, towards Steve, which floors in their dialect. Charlie’s connections with his family members are designed to make readers figure out his have difficulty, but the overt language without right opposition makes readers believe that his family’s shameful point of view.
Ultimately, the most important language that casts shame in mental handicap comes from Charlie himself. Following the operation when he knows that he will fall mentally, Steve is vigorous in fighting that having been a complete person before the procedure. He is infuriated by the experts who deal with him because their sole creation, craving to enable them to see him as important with or without brains. But , after he learns that he will probably return to his original condition, he manages to lose this understanding tone. When he accepts his return to reifungsverzögerung, he also loses value for him self. There is no pragmatism, no acknowledgement that he will probably continue to be a good and important person after his IQ declines. Alternatively, he says “For the first time, Now i am afraid of the future, ” and describes various other handicapped persons as “never having been completely alive”. (Keyes 237, 213) The language he uses to spell out his come back to retardation is usually unhopeful, almost disrespectful of his future self. This is where Keyes fails to make Charlie a hero for the mentally impaired. If viewers were supposed to digest Steve as being a sophisticated before and after the operation, Charlie would have to value his retarded self. Yet Charlie is definitely immensely afraid of his motion towards reifungsverzögerung, as he as well believes it can make him less beneficial. Giving in as to what others have got told him all his life, this individual too is convinced it will help to make him fewer human
Various claim that Plants for Algernon is intended to give complexity and value to handicapped persons. And at first glance, you can perceive this kind of as the case. It would have been completely possible for Bouquets for Algernon to have recently been a story that really, deeply well known mental impairment. But , while Cline describes, “() his [Charlie’s] regression to his original point out becomes the rhetorical bad guy in the story. ” Take care of Charlie while lesser, fantastic heartbreaking perception that this individual too is usually lesser when handicapped, keep readers thinking this completely wrong clause. If perhaps Keyes published Charlie being more accepting of his regression, perhaps viewers would are more understanding and respectful of mentally impaired people within their lives. Sadly the neverending derogatory dialect used by practically every character is actually strong a literary feature to outweigh our measely, uncommon idea that Steve Gordon was, or ever before will be, typical.
Performs Cited
Keyes, Daniel. Flowers for Algernon. Orlando, Harcourt Inc., year 1994, Print. Cline, Brent Walter. “You’re Different Kind of Man: The Progression From Pity to Fear in Daniel Keyes’ Blossoms for Algernon”. Disability Research Quarterly. Volume. 34, No . 4, The Ohio Express University Your local library and The Contemporary society for Incapacity Studies, 2012.
