The handmaids tale and 1894 essay

Category: Rules,
Topics: Handmaid Tale,
Published: 07.04.2020 | Words: 3843 | Views: 338
Download now

Both the books ‘1984’ and ‘The Handmaids Tale’ offer warnings of how each writer sees particular problems in society ultimately causing dystopian declares. Dystopian types exist in both works of fiction, but happen for different factors. Resulting from Atwood’s concerns regarding political teams and areas of feminism; ‘The Handmaids Tale’ illustrates just how declining birth rates could lead to a state exactly where women have into bearing children. In comparison, ‘1984’ depicts a terror state in which poverty is rife and tyrannical leaders force people to live by way of a rules.

Although both books share this sort of themes since surveillance, deprivation and decrease of identity, they will describe two very different dystopian worlds, generally by using identical literary tactics but also differing types.

Need help writing essays?
Free Essays
For only $5.90/page
Order Now

In equally ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ and ‘1984’, language is obviously utilized as a type of state control, enabling dystopian leaders to stay in electric power by exploit language to restrict free thought. People are as a result politically ignorant and struggling to rebel against them. This really is done in ‘1984’ through employing ‘Newspeak’, a lower version of today’s Standard English, or perhaps ‘Oldspeak’.

As the Oceanian forces have omitted words by people’s terminology they are not able to speak words The Get together deems unacceptable or make unorthodox thoughts.

This makes all modes of thought difficult, except all those agreeing with all the Party’s rules. Winston Smith’s conversation with Syme shows this: “Even the coupure will change. How can you have a slogan “Freedom is Slavery When the notion of freedom continues to be abolished.  If The Get together fulfilled their aims, abolishing further words and phrases such as ‘freedom’, citizens could become uninformed that they had ever had ‘freedom’; will not want freedom from the plan, and probably would not rebel against it, offering Big Brother total control.

The appendix further more shows just how reducing phrases and symbolism will have an effect on everyday dialect. “The word free still existed in Newspeak, but could just be used in such statements while ‘This doggie is totally free of lice’¦ it may not provide in its outdated sense¦ as political and intellectual freedom no longer persisted even as concepts The Get together eliminate terms they deem unwanted by removing unorthodox meanings. The word, ‘free’ remains, but is not in this sort of contexts as, ‘free coming from oppression’.

‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ also uses language to control people in the dystopia; but Atwood as well uses Faith based Discourse to prevent unorthodox thought. This could be known as Atwood’s equivalent to Newspeak, though such good restrictions since removing phrases from a language tend not to exist. Faith based discourse arises in the dialogue between handmaids. When Offred meets Ofglen her handmade is “Blessed be the fruit as well as the accepted response, “May god Open. This restricts the actual may say. Even if that they remember past thoughts, they are unable to communicate them, because of linguistic constraints; any rebellious thoughts stay unspoken, allowing the regime to continue unchallenged. It is evident that this technique of restriction performs, as Newspeak works in Oceania. “How I used to despise such discuss. Now I long for it. In least it was talk. A great exchange, of sorts.  This illustrates the extreme restriction of the handmaids’ conversations, straightforward exchanges getting no longer feasible, due to the not enough expected spiritual language.

Newspeak also attempts to prevent totally free thinking by simply abolishing various antonyms. Simply by erasing these types of words individuals are prevented from thinking the contrary to dystopian rule. By way of example by exchanging, ‘bad’, with, “ungood, absolutely nothing bad is out there in language or lifestyle. People are consequently unable to get pregnant that anything at all, including The Party, is awful, restricting even more their power to oppose The Party. The powers in Oceania further more use vocabulary as a exploit force by destroying comparatives and superlatives. In ‘1984’ plans can be found for the comparatives and superlatives of good, better and best to be replaced with prefixed words, plusgood and doubleplusgood. This further restricts the thoughts and terminology of Oceania’s citizens and so their thoughts and actions, as zero words are present to describe these people.

There is no destruction of antonyms, comparatives or perhaps superlatives in ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’, because Gilead capabilities are not eliminating aspects of terminology, merely avoiding people coming from speaking these people, by enforced use of spiritual discourse. Atwood does, yet , use prefixes to describe certain things, implying state control. Words such as “unwomen and “unbaby represent failure. If a handmaid’s kid is top quality, “unbaby, it shows failure toproduce healthy offspring. Handmaids wish to create healthy children, preventing vehicles to the colonies. These prefixes therefore discourage them into conforming, aiming to produce children as the authorities would like.

In both ‘1984’ and ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’, associations are used to re-define the states’ powers. Your government and Aunts suggest safety figures which usually protect world; however connotations have been re-defined, neither determine having the security of the persons in mind. These names, yet , result in persons believing themselves safe under their rulers, having been altered in many ways to make this false impression.

We are able to notice that language in both the text messaging maintain the dystopian societies. Nevertheless as well as severe manipulation of language, the dystopian genre is created throughout the authors kinds of writing.

The styles of Both equally Atwood and Orwell fluctuate, Orwell tending to a straight-forward style with few metaphors, described as ‘restrained’ in Advanced York Remarks. Those metaphors he does include will be fairly simple, for instance , “a filthy liquid chaos that had the appearance of vomit. Poverty in society can be highlighted simply by describing their particular food simply by metaphor. Make use of metaphors are infrequent, due to Orwell’s idea that good prose should be ‘Like a window-pane, easy to see through and the meaning immediately clear.

This design is noticeable in ‘1984’; as there are couple of metaphors and similes; you will discover fewer interpretations inherent in sentences, making the story more straight forward. Yet , when Winston Smith thinks of the ‘Golden Country’, Orwell’s style improvements, becoming a lot more descriptive and metaphorical than previously. Dialect becomes wealthier and character types become cost-free when they include a degree of mental escape from the rulers.

Conversely ‘The Handmaids Tale’ is abundant with metaphor, Atwood with them frequently to achieve the dystopian feel towards the novel. Atwood furthers her descriptions with extended metaphor which Orwell does not. “Well. Then there were the irises ¦ Amaze they’d not long since been rooted out In this verse Atwood uses extended metaphor to evaluate flowers towards the female body and its processes. We are therefore given better insight into thecharacters’ feelings to their condition in Gilead, and the routine. Although information into Winston’s feelings are given in ‘1984’ descriptions happen to be limited making it easier to bring up towards Offred.

The novels are drafted from diverse narrative points of views. ‘The Handmaids Tale’ uses first person story, from the primary character, Offred’s, point of view. Thus giving great insight to the thoughts and feelings of one person, but supplies a limited perspective of Gilead and only advice about the regime that Offred himself discovers. As opposed Orwell uses free roundabout discourse in ‘1984’. In this type of story thoughts and speech of the protagonist are incorporated with their particular words or ideas into third person narrative, promoting understanding of some of Winston’s thoughts and feelings, but not in the detail that first person narrative would, departing the audience a little bit distanced.

Atwood also runs on the language design called Ecriture Feminine, feminine writing or writing your body. It is used as Offred thinks of her body when looking forward to the month-to-month ceremony. “I sink down into my body as into a swamp, fenland, exactly where only I know the footing ¦ My spouse and i listen to my heart, trend upon influx, salty and red, continuous on and on marking time Although Offred is not really celebrating the female body this is a prime sort of ecriture womanly as it is a feminist term for talking about the female body and its processes.

Offred believes of her monthly period and the techniques she must undergo for being pregnant. The style highlights the theme of feminism that operates throughout the book and how woman body procedures have been damaged by the regime. Also shown is terminology of resistance. This is where Offred is able to believe words that will no longer be employed “I may run drive buttons.  To push some one’s buttons is a term that no one would be able to use, having associations of free sexual acts. There are simply no examples of ecriture feminine in ‘1984’ since it predates 20th century feminist ideals.

Atwood also uses Allusion. This is an implied or indirect reference to different texts or perhaps cultures, and could be used by authors to make comparisons among common styles in other texts as well as their own. Atwood refers often tothe Bible. The leaders with the regime use biblical ingredients and phrases to justify their particular actions. Severe rules will be said to be applied as it is God’s will. Cousin Elizabeth tells the handmaids “I will certainly greatly multiply thy sadness and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt provide forth kids.  By utilizing an biblical extract the suffering in society is presented while God’s will certainly and therefore for the greater good. Allusions can also be made to the twentieth 100 years feminism activity that Atwood was a part of, highlighting the violation of women’s legal rights in Gilead, as world reverts back in times before when women had fewer freedoms or rights while men. This exacerbates the dystopia because the idea that males are better than women is extremely outdated. There are simply no references to other text messaging in ‘1984’ but the entire novel have been said to be an allusion to Stalin’s Spain.

Atwood uses language displaying characters oppression within the dystopia created. We see this the moment Offred explains her given room inside the commanders house, “A couch, a stand, a lamp. Above, around the white limit, a relief ornament inside the shape of a wreath, and in the hub of it a blank, space desperate over, like in a face where the vision has been removed.  The sentences happen to be constructed just like a list; a large number of nouns are being used with handful of verbs and commas splitting up individual things.

Offred frequently uses clipped descriptions of her natural environment in the present displaying oppression, becoming far more descriptive when knowing how the past, where, in her memories, she uses a lot more adjectives and greater details. Orwell features a listing strategy in ‘1984’ but for a different sort of purpose. “She had a fresh face, decorated very solid. It was really the paint that appealed to my opinion, the whiteness of it, just like a mask, as well as the bright red lips.  Here results are used to receive straight to the purpose and for immediacy, Orwell not really using many in depth explanations.

In the two ‘1984’ and ‘The Handmaids Tale’, structure aids formation of the dystopia. Orwell uses a three component structure. Although there is a very pessimistic feel right from the start, giving the sense that Winston Smith will not succeed in beating The Party but will be defeated, it truly is emphasised partly One, by which characters and locations will be set up. This can be first seen when Winston begins to reveal his don’t like for Big Brother in thediary. “He wasn’t able to help feeling a twinge of worry.

It was ridiculous, since the writing of those particular words was not more risky than the preliminary act of opening the diary Winston has failed as soon as he exposed the record in any attempt for rebellion up against the Party, this kind of a simple action being certainly punishable by simply death. Consequently from the instance he began his futile rebellion, he offers sentenced himself to loss of life. By adding this data Orwell preserves the dystopian genre, making the reader trust in the strength of the tyrannical market leaders and the insignificance of Winston Smith. This individual gains your readers sympathy for the reason that feeling of foreboding will not be sure to let them believe The Party may be stopped.

The sense of failure upon Winston’s part is taken further in to the novel, when he thinks he’s joining the fabled Brotherhood. “He had the sensation of stepping into the dampness of your grave, and it was very little better because he had usually known the fact that grave was there and waiting for him As Winston’s attempts to participate in a rebellion become more focused he connects to the ‘Brotherhood’, thinking that by doing this he is inserting himself into more needless danger. Orwell again performs this intentionally, improving his dystopia, it now being inconceivable that Winston can get aside with his activities.

Part two then perceives the relationship among Winston and Julia increase. As their so-called love increases so does the sense that they will definitely be uncovered and murdered.  ‘We are the dead, ‘ this individual said. ‘We are the deceased, ‘ echoed Julia dutifully. As their marriage furthers, that they knowingly place themselves in further danger, Orwell creating this feelings purposely, thus there is no doubt anything at all good will come of Winston’s actions. Portion three, therefore , is concerned with the torture and re-education of Winston Johnson where it is evident that he has been doing no good in trying to wipe out The party and their accurate power can be realised.

In contrast ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ runs on the different composition; being divided into alternate day and night sections allowing the feeling of dystopia to be arranged further. Home buying and night times switch between the personal feelings and thoughts of Offred and the everyday life she goes through under the routine. “The evening is my own time, regarding as I is going to, as long as We am peaceful. As long as My spouse and i am avoid move. Because of this she is free from the routine and capable of think is to do as the lady pleases, within her very own mind. This really is one of the few items she owns, through her preoccupation with pronouns, including ‘mine’, ‘my’ and ‘I’.

On these she breaks, emphasising the single thing that is nonetheless hers and the regime leaders cannot have everything from the past away from her. It will help to further the dystopian genre, showing the leaders are in total control and individual everything of the person in addition to their mind and thoughts. “Today, afterwards, with Ofglen, on our shopping walk: We go to the church, as always, and look with the graves. Then to the Wall membrane.  The morning sections focus on things that Offred should do for the regime. In the daytime she is not in control of points she must do. This shows the absolute control of the program as individuals have no amount of time in the day for themselves, especially the handmaids.

Unlike ‘The Handmaids Tale’, ‘1984’ uses motifs in the structure, aiding its progression and contributing to the idea that Winston will be present in his rebellion. Rats are seen by Winston above Charrington’s shop. Winston exercises his disgust to them; next time he is faced with them will be in Room tips, thus making feelings of foreboding, because when Winston sees all of them, they are obviously

his most detrimental fear, providing the impression that they will contribute to his downfall. The children’s nursery vocally mimic eachother ‘Oranges and Lemons’ also reoccurrs throughout. The last line of the rhyme ‘and in this article comes the chopper to chop off your head’ is only showed Winston after he has committed many wrongs inside the eyes in the regime, providing the sense that delivery will be Winston’s fate.

Both equally novels employ flashbacks inside their structure. In ‘The Handmaids Tale’ all their purpose is to show that there was a life just before Gilead that was better than the modern day, highlighting how women of the past got their directly to fight for freedom for granted, and showing how terrible this current regime is usually. ‘1984’ consists of flashbacks but for a different goal. They show that back in the day before but it really is apparent that it may not have been better. Winston can remember a time when he was along with his mother and sister, stillliving in lower income, but with zero suggestion of a regime in place. The main purpose in ‘1984’, however is to demonstrate that before The Get together came to electrical power; people got loyalties to their families and friends. Today no person may have loyalties to any individual but Much larger. This is pointed out when the Parsons children denounce their parents to the regulators.

Atwood and Orwell the two make use of a great appendix. The first function of this is always to give a higher sense of verisimilitude, to boost the harshness of the plan and that they basically existed. In ‘The Handmaids Tale’ the appendix is defined in a school lecture in which Offred’s schedules are talked about. Atwood uses these to show a alert that current trends in society, could easily result in a dystopia not unlike Gilead if the sexism of Professor Pieixoto if taken to extremes. In the seminar he talks in great length of how they attempted to trace the commander, while Offred’s significance seems to be forgotten. This shows the sexism in contemporary society, as the professor appears to sweep the females inside the diary to one side.

The appendix in ‘1984’ conveys the principles of Newspeak and reinforces the impression that such re-organisation of vocabulary could be possible. It also acts as a warning that this could happen if a dictatorship took hold, but is definitely executed totally different to what would be the norm in ‘The Handmaids Tale’. This appendix reads similar to a text message book with very serious tones to enhance the veracity. While the narrative ends, the impression has that the program has persists and that this could be the future of dialect. However in ‘The Handmaids Tale’, set in the near future, with other free of charge characters it appears that Gilead’s culture has halted.

Both books have been crafted with a goal, voicing the concerns the author’s have towards females. Due to their several beliefs Atwood and Orwell draw in different aspects of life, showing what could result if danger is ignored.

First of all, In ‘The Handmaids Tale’ women are left barren, sterile due to pollution and contact with nuclear waste products. Atwood shows the worst case scenario that could arise if people continue to misuse the environment. Environmentalthemes are included as a visible modern issue, encouraging visitors thought about society’s problems.

Atwood is also concerned about far proper, religious organizations. The fundamentalist Christian group, the American New Right believed in being anti-gay, anti-abortion and that could place was the home. A North American almost all male Christian sect, The Promise Keepers, preach ladies should go back to the home and traditional functions, with biblical ideals. A powerful figure in the 2nd wave of feminism, Atwood became worried that people still have these concepts which is shown within Gilead; the routine leaders enabling no freedom of sexuality, all agricultural women must bear children and most girls being forced into stereotypical past tasks; cooks, cleansing agents and moms. These designs offer further more warnings that if folks are not politically aware this kind of groups may gain electrical power, restricting society. We can see coming from these actions, Gilead is probably not so excessive, the story being just a continuation of tips observed in fundamentalist ideas.

The actual birth dirth being skilled in parts on the planet is driven upon by simply Atwood. Displaying what extremes the Gilead leaders have gone to illustrates what could happen if it turns into a real major issue and alerts of how points can spiral out of control.

At the time Orwell wrote ‘1984’ there was much totalitarianism in Spain, Germany and the Soviet Union, and the Communism Party got taken power in China. Governments were suppressing all their people and controlling all their freedom. Therefore it is full of ideas highlighting this unrest, such as poverty, forced work, imprisonment and surveillance. Orwell included this to show how regimes may take hold of a situation or nation and keep people under control by simply disallowing free of charge thought to rebel against all of them. By keeping all of them hungry in addition to poverty individuals have no physical strength to rebel. Orwell was in The country of spain at the time of the fascist plan and discovered the multimedia acting as a tool intended for the market leaders, feeding it is citizens and the world divulgación. This is mirrored as Winston Smith functions in the Ministry of Fact deleting old and changing it therefore the past reflects what The Party say no matter truth.

‘1984’ has also been believed to parody Stalin’s Russia numerous things The Party carry out to retain electric power were occurring there. As an example the editing of stories and the mass media was used by simply both Stalin and The Part of keep control. Individuals are therefore averted from the actual truth of events. Spain retained key police, shown in ‘1984’ as the Thought Police which usually meant nobody was safe from accusation of crimes or perhaps arrest, and children in both occasions inform on parents intended for crimes they will supposedly dedicated. Orwell included all this showing how routines were able to take over quickly, and keep power, and also to warn showing how real a problem it was.

In summary both works of fiction give us some of a imaginary dystopian contemporary society and advise how occasions could take place in the world today. Although they are of the same genre the realms are created simply by different language features and fashions. The author’s had diverse concerns worldwide at the time these were writing therefore the dystopias continue to keep people underneath their control in different methods and for several reasons.

1