In a futuristic world, what part will technology and mother nature play? Back in the 1950s, throughout the Cold War, Ray Bradbury published a tale about your life in 2026. In the account, Bradbury details a day in a house full of technology although no humans. Bradbury applied Sara Teasdale’s poem “There Will Come Very soft Rains” in the story and for his subject because the composition contains similar themes of nature will usually prevail, devastation of humanity, and guy (technology) vs . nature.
One noticeable theme that both literary works display is that mother nature will always dominate. In order to demonstrate this topic, the Teasdale writes, “And Spring himself, when your woman woke by dawn/ Will scarcely understand that we were gone” (Teasdale, stanza 6). Through this quote, Spring, a symbol of characteristics, has awoken, but humanity is gone. Through the viewpoint the fact that victors will be the last kinds standing, it could be inferred that Nature has won, since mankind is fully gone but nature still remains. To further stress that mother nature will always get, Bradbury details a intense battle between nature and technology by which nature is the winner: “And after that, reinforcements…The open fire backed off as actually an hippo must whenever he a dead snake. Now there were twenty snakes…killing the fire…But the fire was clever. Completely sent flames outside the house…The fire broken the house and let it slam flat down, puffing out skirts of spark and smoke” (Bradbury, pg. 4). Fire can be part of character, here, it truly is clear the fact that house signifies technology and is fighting against nature. At the end of the fight, the house can be destroyed and nature features prevailed. Consequently , based on the evidence above, both the story plus the poem develop the same theme of nature will always prevail.
Both Bradbury and Teasdale also express the same theme of destruction of humanity in their works. As an example, Teasdale writes in her poem, “And not one will know of the warfare, not one/ Will treatment at last when it is done. / Not one will mind…If the human race perished utterly” (Teasdale, stanzas 4-5). The quote offers stated quite upfront that mankind has become destroyed, most probably because of war. Therefore , it could be implied which the poem provides the theme of destruction of humanity. Similarly, Bradbury also includes the theme of mankind’s destruction in his story: “The house was alone in a city of trash and ashes. This was one house left standing. At nighttime the messed up city offered off a radioactive light that could be viewed for miles…The house was an altar with five thousand attendantsBut the gods had gone apart, and the practice of religion continued senselessly, uselessly” (Bradbury, pgs. 1-2). Right here, it can be inferred that the city was destroyed in a war, possibly with a nuclear weapon. The house can be empty, which in turn further facilitates the fact that mankind is finished, at least from this town. Overall, depending on parts of the two story plus the poem, both equally pieces of materials express the theme of destruction of the people.
One other theme that both disposition demonstrate can be man (technology) versus character. In order to show this situation, Bradbury gives a picture of an powerful clash between technology and nature: “The house offered ground since the fire in ten billion angry leads to moved with flaming convenience from room to place and the the stairs. While scurrying water rats squeaked from the walls, pistoled their very own water, and ran for more. And the wall structure sprays let down showers of mechanical rain” (Bradbury, pg. 3). From this quote, readers can see that technology is definitely battling character in the form of the home fighting the fire. From this, visitors can then infer that the idea is technology versus characteristics. In the poem, however , the theme is usually not as apparent: “And not merely one will know with the war, certainly not one/ Will care eventually when it is completed. / Not one would mind, neither chicken nor shrub, / If mankind perished utterly” (Teasdale, stanzas 4-5). Here, the “one” refers to the parrots, frogs, bonbon tree, etc, that symbolizes nature with this poem. That states in the poem that nature will not mind in the event that mankind perished, therefore , characteristics must not just like humanity. In case you are friends with another person, you can expect to obviously worry about their health and wellness. On the flip side, in case you absolutely dislike the other person, whether they live or die can be not your problem, you would not care whatsoever. From this perspective point, it can be assumed that nature does not like mankind, and is for that reason against that.
After analysis of Bradbury’s history and Teasdale’s poem, we now have seen that Bradbury utilized Teasdale’s composition in his tale because both contain the same themes of nature will usually prevail, damage of humanity, and gentleman (technology) vs nature. From battling against each other not to caring regarding the well being of an additional, both fictional works demonstrate, in their very own way, the themes that they can use are the same. After examining the story “August 2026: There Will Come Soft Rains”, readers may well understand the safety measures and messages about battle and technology embedded in the plot. In the future, how advanced will technology become? How dangerous will weapons used in war turn into? What will happen for the nature we certainly have grown up with and known as children?