Why Literature Essay

Category: Managing,
Published: 12.10.2019 | Words: 5678 | Views: 432
Download now

It has often took place to me, for book fairs or in bookstores, which a gentleman techniques me and asks me for a personal unsecured. “It is made for my wife, my personal young girl, or my own mother, ” he clarifies. “She is a superb reader and loves materials. ” Quickly I request: “And think about you?

Don’t you like to go through? ” The solution is almost always a similar: “Of study course I like to examine, but I actually am an extremely busy person. ” I use heard this kind of explanation many times: this kind of man and many thousands of guys like him have so many important things to accomplish, so many obligations, so many duties in life, that they can cannot spend their precious time buried within a novel, a book of beautifully constructed wording, or a literary essay all night and several hours. According to the widespread conception, literature can be described as dispensable activity, no doubt lofty and useful for cultivating sensitivity and good manners, but essentially a great entertainment, a great adornment that only people with time for recreation can pay for.

Need help writing essays?
Free Essays
For only $5.90/page
Order Now

It is a thing to fit in between sports, the films, a game of bridge or perhaps chess; this means you will be sacrificed without scruple when a single “prioritizes” the duties and the tasks that are essential in the have difficulty of existence. It seems very clear that literature has become a lot more a female activity. In bookstores, at conferences or public readings by simply writers, and even in university departments dedicated to the humanities, the women clearly outnumber the men.

The reason traditionally presented is that middle-class women visit our website because that they work fewer hours than men, so many of them think that they can warrant more easily than men the time that they devote to fantasy and illusion. I am to some extent allergic to explanations that divide people into frosty categories and attribute to each sex the characteristic benefits and disadvantages; but undoubtedly that there are fewer readers of literature, and that among the conserving remnant of readers ladies predominate. This is actually the case just about everywhere. In Spain, for instance , a recent review organized by the General Contemporary society of The spanish language Writers revealed that half of that country’s human population has never go through a book.

The survey also revealed that in the minority that does go through, the number of girls that admitted to reading exceeds the number of guys by 6th. 2 percent, a difference that appears to be increasing. I am happy for these ladies, but I feel sorry for these men, and then for the countless human beings whom could browse but have didn’t read.

They will earn my pity not merely because they are unacquainted with the satisfaction that they are lacking, but also because I am convinced that a contemporary society without literary works, or a society in which literary works has been relegated–like some invisible vice–to the margins of social and private life, and transformed into something like a sectarian cult, is a society condemned to become mentally barbaric, and to jeopardize its flexibility. I wish to offer a few disputes against the notion of literature being a luxury pastime, and in prefer of browsing it as one of the most principal and important undertakings from the mind, a great irreplaceable activity for the organization of people in a modern and democratic society, a society of free individuals. |[pic] | at the live in the era with the specialization expertise, thanks to the prodigious development of science and technology and to the consequent partage of knowledge in innumerable parcels and storage compartments.

This cultural trend is, if nearly anything, likely to be emphasized in years into the future. To be sure, specialization brings lots of advantages. It provides for deeper search and higher experimentation; is it doesn’t very engine of improvement.

Yet additionally, it has adverse consequences, for doing it eliminates individuals common perceptive and ethnical traits that permit people to co-exist, to speak, to experience a sense of unification. Specialization causes a lack of interpersonal understanding, to the division of humans into ghettos of technicians and specialists. The specialization of knowledge requires specialized languages and significantly arcane codes, as information becomes a lot more specific and compartmentalized. This is the particularism plus the division against which a well used proverb cautioned us: do not focus too much on the department or the leaf, lest you forget that they will be part of a tree, or perhaps too much for the tree, poste you forget that it is element of a forest.

Awareness of the existence of the forest creates the sensation of generality, the feeling of belonging, that binds world together and prevents this from disintegrating into a myriad of solipsistic particularities. The solipsism of nations and individuals produces paranoia and delirium, effects of fact that make hatred, battles, and even genocide. In our period, science and technology are unable to play a great integrating position, precisely because of the infinite richness of knowledge and the speed of its advancement, which have led to specialization and its obscurities.

Yet literature has become, and will continue being, as long as that exists, one of many common denominators of human experience through which human beings may well recognize themselves and talk to each other, regardless of different their very own professions, their particular life programs, their physical and ethnic locations, their personal conditions. It has enabled individuals, in all the particularities of their lives, to transcend history: as visitors of Cervantes, Shakespeare, Dante, and Tolstoy, we understand each other throughout space and time, and we feel ourself to be users of the same types because, inside the works the particular writers created, we find out what we discuss as people, what is still common in most of us under the broad range of differences that separate us.

Nothing better protects a person against the ignorance of misjudgment, racism, religious or politics sectarianism, and exclusivist nationalism than this truth that invariably shows up in great literature: that men and women of all nations and places are essentially equal, which only injustice sows among them discrimination, fear, and fermage. Nothing teaches us a lot better than literature to determine, in cultural and social differences, the richness with the human patrimony, and to award those variations as a outward exhibition of humanity’s multi-faceted creativeness.

Reading very good literature is an experience of pleasure, of course; but it is also an experience of learning what and exactly how we are, within our human ethics and each of our human flaw, with our actions, our dreams, and the ghosts, alone and in associations that hyperlink us to others, in our public image and in the secret recesses of our consciousness. |[pic| |] | his complex amount of contradictory truths–as Isaiah Berlin named them–constitutes the substance in the human state. In today’s world, this kind of totalizing and living understanding of a human being can be found just in materials.

Not even the other limbs of the humanities–not philosophy, record, or the arts, and certainly not the interpersonal sciences–have been able to preserve this kind of integrating perspective, this universalizing discourse. The humanities, too, have was a victim of the cancerous division and subdivision of knowledge, isolating themselves in more and more segmented and technical sectors whose tips and phrases lie past the reach of the prevalent woman and man. Several critics and theorists would even like to change literature into a science.

Yet this will by no means happen, because fiction would not exist to check into only just one precinct of experience. This exists to enrich through the imagination the whole of human being life, which usually cannot be dismembered, disarticulated, or reduced to a series of schemas or formulas without disappearing. This is the which means of Proust’s observation that “real existence, at last enlightened and revealed, the only life fully lived, is books. ” Having been not exaggerating, nor was he revealing only his love for his very own vocation. Having been advancing this proposition that as a result of literary works life is better understood and better were living; and that living life more fully requires living it and showing it with others.

The brotherly hyperlink that materials establishes between human beings, persuasive them to enter dialogue and making them conscious of a common source and one common goal, goes beyond all temporal barriers. Literary works transports all of us into the past and links us to prospects who in bygone eras plotted, loved, and imagined through all those texts which have come down to us, text messaging that now allow us as well to enjoy and dream.

This kind of feeling of membership in the group human experience across some space may be the highest achievement of tradition, and nothing leads to more to its revival in every era than books. |[| |p| |i| |c| |]| capital t always inflammed Borges when he was asked, “What is the use of materials? ” This seemed to him a stupid question, where he would respond: “No you are likely to ask what is the use of a canary’s song or possibly a beautiful sun. ” If perhaps such fabulous things exist, and if, due to them, life is even to get an instant much less ugly and fewer sad, could it be not small to seek sensible justifications? But the question is a good one.

For novels and poems are certainly not like the audio of birdsong or the spectacle of the sunshine sinking in to the horizon, because they were not really created by chance or perhaps by nature. They are really human creations, and it is for that reason legitimate might how and why that they came into the world, and what is their purpose, and so why they have survived so long. Fictional works are born, while shapeless ghosts, in the closeness of a writer’s consciousness, forecasted into it by combined strength of the unconscious, and the writer’s sensitivity towards the world about him, plus the writer’s feelings; and it is this stuff to which the poet or the narrator, within a struggle with terms, gradually offers form, human body, movement, beat, harmony, and life.

A great artificial your life, to be sure, a life imagined, a your life made of language–yet men and women search for this manufactured life, several frequently, other folks sporadically, since real life declines short for these people, and is incapable of offering these people what they want. Books does not set out to exist through the work of a single specific. It exists only when it is adopted simply by others and becomes a element of social life–when it becomes, as a result of reading, a shared encounter.

One of its initially beneficial effects takes place at the degree of language. A community without a created literature conveys itself with less accuracy, with fewer richness of nuance, and with much less clarity when compared to a community in whose principal device of connection, the word, has been cultivated and perfected by way of literary texts. A humanity without browsing. untouched by simply literature, could resemble a community of deaf-mutes and aphasics, afflicted by incredible problems of communication because of its crude and rudimentary dialect.

This is true for people, too. A person who does not read, or reads little, or reads simply trash, is actually a person with an obstacle: he can speak much although he will declare little, because his terminology is poor in the opportinity for self-expression. This may not be only a verbal limitation. It signifies also a constraint in intelligence and in imagination. It is a poverty of believed, for the simple reason that ideas, the concepts by which we grasp the secrets of your condition, do not exist in addition to words.

All of us learn how to speak correctly–and deeply, rigorously, and subtly–from good literature, and only from great literature. Simply no other self-control or subset of the arts may substitute for literature in making the language that folks need to connect. To speak very well, to have by one’s fingertips a rich and diverse language, in order to find the appropriate manifestation for every thought and every feeling that we desire to connect, is to be better prepared to think, to teach, to master, to speak, and also to imagine, to fantasy, to think. In a surreptitious way, words reverberate in every our actions, even in those actions that appear far taken from language.

And as language advanced, thanks to books, and reached high amounts of refinement and manners, it increased associated with human satisfaction. Literature provides even served to confer upon like and desire and the sexual act itself the status of artistic creation. Without literature, eroticism probably would not exist. Like and delight would be poorer, they would lack delicacy and exquisiteness, they would fail to obtain to the strength that fictional fantasy presents. It is scarcely an hyperbole to say that a couple that have read Garcilaso, Petrarch, Gongora, or Baudelaire value delight and knowledge pleasure a lot more than illiterate those who been made into idiots by television’s cleansing soap operas.

Within an illiterate universe, love and desire will be no unlike what complies with animals, neither would they transcend the crude completion of fundamental instincts. Nor are the audiovisual media equipped to replace books in this activity of teaching humans to use with assurance and with skill the extraordinarily rich options that dialect encompasses. On the other hand, the audiovisual media usually relegate words and phrases to a extra level regarding images, which are the primordial vocabulary of these media, and to constrain language to its mouth expression, to its indispensable minimum, not even close to its created dimension. To define a movie or a television set program since “literary” is definitely an elegant method of saying that it can be boring.

Because of this, literary courses on the car radio or on television rarely record the public. In terms of I know, the sole exception to this rule was Bernard Pivot’s program, Apostrophes, in France. And this qualified prospects me to think that not simply is literary works indispensable to get a full understanding and a complete mastery of language, nevertheless fate is definitely linked likewise and indissolubly with the fate of the publication, that industrial product that many are now filing obsolete. |[pic| |] | his brings me to Bill Entrances.

He was in Madrid recently and visited the Regal Spanish Schools, which has embarked upon a joint venture with Microsoft. And a lot more, Gates certain the users of the Academy that he’d personally make sure the page “-” would never be removed from computer software–a promise that allowed four hundred million Spanish speakers upon five regions to inhale a heave a sigh of alleviation, since the exile of such an essential letter from cyberspace would have produced monumental problems. Immediately after producing his de gre a gre concession to the Spanish terminology, however , Entrances, before actually leaving the premises in the Academy, avowed in a press conference that he supposed to accomplish his highest objective before he died.

That goal, this individual explained, is always to put an end to daily news and then to books. In his judgment, literature are anachronistic objects. Entrance argued that computer displays are able to exchange paper out of all functions that paper provides heretofore thought.

He likewise insisted that, in addition to being significantly less onerous, computer systems take up less space, and are easier transportable; and in addition that the transmission of news and literature by these electric media, rather than by magazines and literature, will have the ecological good thing about stopping the destruction of forests, a cataclysm it really is a consequence in the paper sector. People will certainly continue to examine, Gates assured his audience, but they can read on computer system screens, and therefore there will be even more chlorophyll inside the environment. I was not present at Gates’s little task; I discovered these details through the press.

Got I already been through it I would have got booed Entrance for stating shamelessly his intention to deliver me and my acquaintances, the authors of literature, directly to the unemployment range. And I might have vigorously disputed his analysis. Can the display really exchange the publication in all its elements? I i am not so specific.

I are fully conscious of the enormous revolution that new technologies such as the Internet have got caused in the fields of communication as well as the sharing details, and I confess that the Internet provides important help to me personally every day inside my work; nevertheless my honor for these amazing conveniences would not imply a belief the fact that electronic screen can change paper, or that examining on a computer system can wait in for literary reading. It really is a chasm that we cannot mix.

I cannot agree to the idea that a nonfunctional or perhaps non-pragmatic take action of studying, one that tries neither information nor a handy and quick communication, may integrate on a computer screen the dreams and the pleasures of words while using same sensation of closeness, the same mental concentration and spiritual remoteness, that may be achieved by the take action of studying a book. Perhaps this a prejudice resulting from lack of practice, and coming from a long affiliation of literature with books and paper. But even though I like surfing the Web in search of world news, I might never see a screen to read a composition by Gongora or a book by Onetti or a great essay simply by Paz, because I am certain that the effect of this sort of a studying would not become the same.

I am confident, although I cannot prove this, that with all the disappearance of the book, literary works would go through a serious strike, even a human one. The definition of “literature” probably would not disappear, of course. Yet it will almost certainly be applied to denote a kind of text since distant coming from what we figure out as materials today since soap operas are from the tragedies of Sophocles and Shakespeare. |[pic| |] | here is still another reason to grant materials an important place in the life of nations. Without this, the crucial mind, which can be the real engine of famous change and the best protection of freedom, would go through an unico loss.

This is because all good literature is revolutionary, and creates radical inquiries about the earth in which all of us live. In all of the great fictional texts, generally without their very own authors’ thinking about it, a seditious desire is present. Materials says nothing to those people who will be satisfied with their very own lot, who are content with life as they now live it. Literature is the food of the rebellious spirit, the promulgator of nonconformities, the refuge for those who have too much or too little in every area of your life.

One seeks sanctuary in literature so as not to be unhappy and thus as not to be imperfect. To drive alongside the scrawny Rocinante and the mixed up Knight on the fields of La Verguenza, to sail the seas on the back side of a whale with Chief Ahab, to drink arsenic with Emma Bovary, to become an insect with Gregor Samsa: these are most ways that we have invented to divest themselves of the wrongs and the impositions of this unjust life, a life that forces us always to be the same person when we desire to get many different people, so as to satisfy the many needs that possess us.

Books pacifies this kind of vital dissatisfaction only momentarily–but in this amazing instant, in this provisional postponement, interruption of your life, literary optical illusion lifts and transports us outside of history, and we become citizens of the timeless land, and in that way immortal. We become more intense, richer, more difficult, happier, plus more lucid than we are in the constrained program of common life. Once we close the book and abandon fictional fiction, we return to real existence and compare it to the marvelous land that we get just still left.

What a disappointment awaits us! Yet a huge realization also awaits all of us, namely, the fact that fantasized life of the new is better–more beautiful and even more diverse, even more comprehensible plus more perfect–than lifespan that we live while awake, a lifestyle conditioned by limits plus the tedium of the condition. This way, good literature, genuine materials, is always subversive, unsubmissive, rebellious: a challenge to what exists. How do we not really feel conned after browsing War and Peace or perhaps Remembrance of Things Earlier and returning to our world of insignificant details, of limitations and prohibitions that rest in hang on everywhere and, with each step, corrupt the illusions?

Much more than the have to sustain the continuity of culture and to enrich language, the greatest contribution of literature to man progress is probably to remind us (without intending to, inside the majority of cases) that the universe is terribly made; and that those who pretend that to the opposite, the effective and the blessed, are laying; and that the universe can be increased, and made more like the worlds that our creativeness and each of our language have the ability to create. A free of charge and democratic society should have responsible and critical individuals conscious of the importance continuously to measure the world that people inhabit and try, although it is more plus more an difficult task, to create it even more closely appear like the world that we would like to live in.

And there is zero better means of fomenting unhappiness with lifestyle than the studying of good materials; no better means of building critical and independent citizens who will not really be altered by those who govern them, and who also are endowed with a long lasting spiritual mobility and a delightful imagination. Even now, to call up literature seditious because it sensitizes a reader’s consciousness towards the imperfections worldwide does not mean–as churches and governments apparently think it means when they create censorship–that fictional texts will certainly provoke immediate social upheavals or increase revolutions.

The social and political effects of a poem, a perform, or a story cannot be foreseen, because they are certainly not collectively manufactured or each experienced. They are really created by simply individuals and perhaps they are read by individuals, who have vary tremendously in the conclusions that they combine their composing and their studying. For this reason, it is difficult, or even not possible, to establish correct patterns.

In addition, the cultural consequences of a work of literature may have no to do with its aesthetic top quality. A mediocre novel by simply Harriet Beecher Stowe has played a decisive position in raising social and political awareness of the horrors of slavery in the United States. The truth that these effects of literature will be difficult to discover does not signify they do not exist. The important level is that they will be effects caused by the activities of residents whose personalities have been shaped in part simply by books. Very good literature, whilst temporarily relieving human discontentment, actually boosts it, simply by developing a important and non-conformist attitude toward life.

It might even be declared that literature makes human beings very likely to be disappointed. To live dissatisfied, and at conflict with existence, is to seek things that may not end up being there, to condemn oneself to fight useless battles, just like the battles that Colonel Aureliano Buend’a fought against in One Hundred Years of Solitude, knowing full well that he would shed them all. All of this may be authentic. Yet also, it is true that without rebellion against the mediocrity and the squalor of existence, we would even now live in a primitive express, and background would have stopped.

The autonomous individual would not have been made, science and technology will not have developed, human rights would not had been recognized, freedom would not have got existed. All these things are delivered of unhappiness, of serves of defiance against a life perceived as insufficient or intolerable. Just for this spirit that scorns your life as it is–and searches while using madness of Don Quixote, whose madness derived from the reading of chivalric novels–literature has dished up as a wonderful spur. |[pi| |c] | et all of us attempt an incredible historical reconstruction.

Let us picture a world without literature, a humanity that has not examine poems or novels. Through this kind of atrophied civilization, with its puny lexicon in which groans and ape-like gesticulations will prevail over words, particular adjectives will not exist. Those adjectives contain: quixotic, Kafkaesque, Rabelaisian, Orwellian, sadistic, and masochistic, every terms of literary origins. To be sure, we would still have ridiculous people, and victims of paranoia and persecution processes, and people with uncommon appetites and crazy excesses, and bipeds who enjoy inflicting or obtaining pain. Although we would not have learned to find out, behind these kinds of extremes of behavior which have been prohibited by the norms of the culture, vital characteristics with the human state.

We would not have discovered our personal traits, while only the talents of Cervantes, Kafka, Rabelais, Orwell, para Sade, and Sacher-Masoch have revealed those to us. If the novel Wear Quixote de la Mancha came out, its initial readers built fun on this extravagant dreamer, as well as the remaining characters in the novel. Today we know that the insistence of the caballero de la triste elegancia on seeing giants high were windmills, and on acting in his seemingly absurd way, is really the very best form of kindness, and a way of demonstration against the misery of this world in the desire of changing that.

Our very notions from the ideal, along with idealism, thus redolent having a positive ethical connotation, would not be what exactly they are, would not be manifest and respected principles, had they will not recently been incarnated inside the protagonist of any novel throughout the persuasive force of Cervantes’s genius. Similar can be said of this small and practical female Quixote, Emma Bovary, who battled with verve to live the splendid life of passion and luxury that she reached know through novels. Like a butterfly, she came also close to the fire and was burned inside the fire. |[pic| |] | he technology of all superb literary makers open our eyes to unknown facets of our own condition. They enable us to explore and to appreciate more fully the normal human underworld.

When we state “Borgesian, ” the word right away conjures up the separation of your minds in the rational order of truth and the admittance into a great universe, a rigorous and elegant mental construction, almost always labyrinthine and dissimule, and riddled with literary recommendations and allusions, whose singularities are not foreign to us because in them we recognize concealed desires and intimate truths of our own personality that took shape only due to literary creation of Jorge Luis Borges. The word “Kafkaesque” comes to mind, like the focus device of those outdated cameras with their accordion hands, every time we all feel endangered, as defenseless individuals, by the oppressive equipment of electricity have caused so much pain and injustice in the modern world–the authoritarian routines, the top to bottom parties, the intolerant chapels, the asphyxiating bureaucrats.

Without the short tales and the novels of that tormented Jew via Prague who also wrote in German and lived always on the lookout, we would not have had the capacity to understand the impotent a sense of the isolated individual, or perhaps the terror of persecuted and discriminated minorities, confronted with the all-embracing forces that can break them and eliminate all of them without the henchmen even demonstrating their faces. The qualificative “Orwellian, ” first cousin of “Kafkaesque, ” gives a voice to the terrible suffering, the sensation of extreme absurdity, that was generated by totalitarian dictatorships with the twentieth century, the most superior, cruel, and absolute dictatorships in history, in their control of the actions as well as the psyches with the members of any society.

In 1984, George Orwell referred to in cold and haunting shades a humanity subjugated to Your government, an absolute lord who, by using a efficient mixture of terror and technology, taken away liberty, impulse, and equality, and transformed society to a beehive of automatons. Through this nightmarish world, language also obeys electricity, and has been transformed into “newspeak, ” filtered of all technology and all subjectivity, metamorphosed in a string of platitudes that ensure the individual’s slavery to the system.

It is the case that the threatening prophecy of 1984 would not come to pass, and totalitarian communism inside the Soviet Union went the way of totalitarian fascism in Indonesia and elsewhere; and rapidly thereafter it began to damage also in China, and anachronistic Cuba and North Korea. Nevertheless the danger will certainly not be completely dispelled, and the word “Orwellian” continues to describe the danger, and to help us to know it. |[pic| |] | o literature’s unrealities, literature’s lies, are usually a important vehicle pertaining to the knowledge of the extremely hidden of human realities. The truths that it reveals are not often flattering; and sometimes the image of ourselves that emerges inside the mirror of novels and poems is a image of a monster.

This happens when we read about the horrendous sexual butchery fantasized by para Sade, or the dark lacerations and challenging sacrifices that fill the cursed literature of Sacher-Masoch and Combat. At times the spectacle is so offensive and ferocious which it becomes alluring. Yet the worst in these webpages is certainly not the blood, the humiliation, the abject appreciate of torture; the most detrimental is the discovery that this physical violence and this excessive are not overseas to us, that they are a profound element of humanity.

These types of monsters anticipating transgression happen to be hidden in one of the most intimate recesses of our getting; and from your shadow where they live they search for a propitious occasion to manifest themselves, to impose the guideline of loads of desire that destroys rationality, community, and even existence. And it was not science that first embarked into these kinds of tenebrous locations in the man mind, and discovered the destructive as well as the self-destructive potential that also shapes this. It was literature that made this discovery. A new without materials would be partly blind to terrible absolute depths, which all of us urgently ought to see.

Uncivilized, barbarian, without sensitivity and crude of speech, uninformed and instinctual, inept by passion and crude by love, this world without literature, this headache that I was delineating, might have as its main traits conformism and the widespread submission of humankind to power. Through this sense, it might also be a purely earthy world. Fundamental instincts will determine the daily practices of a life characterized by the struggle for survival, as well as the fear of the unknown, as well as the satisfaction of physical requirements. There would be room for the spirit.

In this world, moreover, the crushing boredom of living would be combined with the scary shadow of pessimism, the sensation that individual life is what it had to be which it will continually be thus, and this no one and nothing can change this. When one imagines such a world, the first is tempted to picture primitives in loincloths, the small magic-religious communities that live at the margins of modern quality in Latina America, Oceania, and The african continent. But Excellent different failing in mind.

The nightmare that I am warning about may be the result certainly not of under-development but of over-development. Because of technology and our subservience to that, we may think about a future world full of pc screens and speakers, minus books, or maybe a society by which books–that is, works of literature–have turn into what becoming became in the era of physics: a great archaic curiosity, practiced inside the catacombs of the media world by a neurotic minority. I actually am frightened that this cybernetic world, inspite of its wealth and its electric power, its substantial standard of living and its scientific achievements would be greatly uncivilized and utterly soulless–a resigned humanity of post-literary automatons who may have abdicated flexibility.

It is highly improbable, naturally , that this sombre utopia will ever come about. The finish of our story, the end of the past, has not yet been created, and it is certainly not pre-determined. Whatever we will become will depend entirely about our eye-sight and our will. When we wish to avoid the impoverishment of our imagination, and the disappearance of the treasured dissatisfaction that refines our sensibility and teaches us to speak with fervor and rigor, and the weakening of our flexibility, then we must act. Even more precisely, we have to read.

MARIO VARGAS LLOSA’s new publication, The Party of the Goat, will be released by Farrar, Straus & Giroux in November. He’s professor of Ibero-American Literary works and Tradition at Georgetown University.