Compare and contrast two theories models of

Category: Health,
Topics: Each other,
Published: 31.12.2019 | Words: 2822 | Views: 226
Download now

You will discover two primary theories applied to relationships, Social Exchange Theory and Equity Theory underpin commonly used behavioural therapies such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Improved Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Integrative Cognitive Behavioural Remedy. More recent research in neuroscience and behaviour and the significance of language have led to the development of Relational Frame Theory and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as an alternative strategy. In this composition I will summarize the relationship designs comparing and contrasting all of them. I will also introduce and briefly touch on Relational Frame Theory and Acknowledgement and Commitment Therapy because an additional way of couples guidance and offer things to consider which an integrative therapist might need to take into account when offering counselling to couples.

Social Exchange Theory is exploring interactions between two parties by evaluating the costs and benefits to each. The theory recommended by Homans in 1958 is not exclusively used on relationships as it also is exploring all social systems and considers the energy balance inside those devices.

Need help writing essays?
Free Essays
For only $5.90/page
Order Now

The key point with the theory is the fact it assumes the two functions are both offering and receiving components of value coming from each other. Below this theory, relationships are merely likely to continue if each feel they are really coming out of the exchange with more than they are supplying up”that is definitely, if there is a positive amount of great benefit for both parties involved.

Homans’ work to define and understand society was centered around the analyze of human behaviour regarding cost and reward. This kind of understanding of conduct is accepted also in the work of Pavlow and Skinner. Homan later went on to apply his theory to relationships proposing in his Bothersome Justice hypothesis that since human beings we all expect a relationship to get proportional and if the praise or reciprocity falls in short supply of the cost all of us become disappointed and are very likely to end a relationship. Nevertheless he also proposed that if one particular party interprets that the prize outweighs the charge provided nevertheless the other half from the relationship is usually content the relationship will be adequate. Homans (1958, P. 606)

“Social actions are an exchange of goods, material goods although alsonon-material ones, such as the signs of acceptance or respect. Persons that give much to others try to get very much from them, and persons that get much from other folks are under pressure to give much to all of them. This process of influence tends to work out in equilibrium to a balance in the exchanges. For a person in an exchange, what he gives may be a cost to him, just as what he gets may be a reward, and his tendencies changes significantly less as the difference of the two, profit, tends to a optimum.  In relationships Homan proposed the fact that reward is somewhat more valuable to the individual if this reinforces the self esteem or perhaps provides cultural approval specially in areas of existence where we feel insecure and we happen to be drawn to a partner who gives this a lot more than rewards or perhaps approval pertaining to things all of us already level ourselves to get.

In return we provide the same kind of strokes to our spouse reinforcing and boosting their esteem in areas through which they truly feel most insecure. This is called the principle of satiation. The costs in a fulfilling romantic relationship can be split up into three groups: Investment costs- mental strength and psychological investment, Immediate costs ” time, monetary and material investments and Opportunity costs- personal sacrifices to benefit the relationship. Because all behaviour is costly in that it requires an expenditure of energy on the part of the individual, only those behaviors that are paid or that produce the smallest amount of cost are likely to be repeated. Thus, social exchanges undertake an atmosphere of uniformity in that patterns of advantages often continue to be stable in social human relationships. Thibault and Kelley in 1959 developed a 4 level model of permanent relationships depending on Homans social exchange theory research. Thibault and Kelley applied two basic principles to their operate.

Firstly, that human conversation is encouraged by perceived rewards for the action and second relates to how that impacts the nature of associations. The several stages Sampling, Bargaining, Determination and Institutionalisation describe what sort of relationship varieties and forms. The theory can be predominantly behaviourist and takes on that humans operate as rational creatures making decisions based on costs and rewards and that their particular decision making is usually motivated by the desire to receive basic specific requirements met. The first level in the version, Sampling, is definitely exploring the costs and advantages of various communications through a a few different friendships and relationships and observing different people in their relationships to be able to discern what works and what does not.

Psychologists interpret thesocial behaviour of adolescents and the younger generation as they flit from one relationship/friendship to another since this sample stage in action. Bargaining is definitely the natural progress undertaken as a new relationship is usually under consideration. Exactly what is in this for me? Basically do/give this what will I get in return? At this stage fascination based about similar perceptions or constructs are explored with a view to establishing the viability of a possible relationship. Both parties may possibly ask themselves ‘Is it gonna be worthwhile investing in this? ‘ Commitment comes after when the two parties understand enough about each other to develop the ability to anticipate each others’ behaviour and so elicit reward/pleasure/satisfaction from the other person. Institutionalisation is the last step when the two parties know what to expect from each other and settle into established norms.

Equity Theory was developed by Social Exchange Theory by Walster in 1978. Elaine Hatfield worked closely with Walster and Ellen Berscheid inside the seventies to comprehend the human idea of social proper rights. She says

Relating to Equity theory, persons feel very comfortable when they are receiving exactly what that they deserve from other relationships”no the certainly no less. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Hatfield, Elizabeth. & Rapson, R. M. Glyph International 2011.

In addition, she says of her use Walster and Bercheid

We all believed which a concern with fairness was a social universal. I was convinced that during humankind’s long major heritage, a concern with social justice had become writ inside the mind’s “architecture because such values owned survival worth. Such issues were taken care of, we believed, because performing fairly always been a wise and profitable approach in today’s world. Guide of Hypotheses of Social Psychology. Hatfield, E. & Rapson, 3rd there’s r. L. Glyph International 2011.

It is accepted that during history, communities have had diverse visions in regards to what constitutes “social justice,  “fairness,  and “equity and that these kinds of differences even now influence perspectives on what socialjustice means to the individual and to different communities across the globe. Furthermore their regular research will take into consideration the existing shifts within society toward gender equal rights and how this kind of influences relationships. Equity Theory is essentially centered around stability within a marriage and can be summarised by 5 key rules.

1 . People will try to increase reward and minimise unpleasant experience within a relationship installment payments on your Rewards could be shared in different ways and individuals will determine what they agree to be a fair system several. An unfair or inequitable relationship causes personal problems 4. A person in an inequitable romance will attempt to bring back balance as well as the degree where the relationship is unfair the harder they are going to try to bring back the balance.

Both theories are based around the assumption that relationships develop out of the fair exchange or trading of costs and rewards. Equity Theory although it takes into account societal alterations is less worried about society which is more concerned with individuals and exactly how they understand justice. The key difference between your two hypotheses is that exactly where Exchange Theory would propose that people will leave a relationship as it is if they felt they were in the advantaged position wherever rewards have concerns, Equity Theory suggests that the individual would be motivated to restore the equity within an unbalanced relationship by both reducing all their input or perhaps increasing their particular outputs.

Exchange Theory is more concerned with under-benefit as a disadvantage but Collateral Theory spots a greater emphasis on both under-benefit and over-benefit. Under-benefits probably provoke a sense of anger and resentment and over-benefits probably provoke a feeling of guilt. Possibly scenario can become unbearable for the party encountering either anger or sense of guilt resulting in them attempting to re-establish balance. If perhaps this does not seem to work, it is likely that the relationship will breakdown because an equilibrium has not been come to.

Both ideas can be useful equipment for a specialist in lovers counselling in order to discern in which a couple reaches within their relationship and to help them move toward a state of balance or equity because it has been lost. They the two provide the basis from which to consider the actions of eachindividual within a marriage, to consider how it may have improved and how levels of reciprocity are getting to be distorted resulting in the experience of over/under benefit and therefore to create equipment to realign the behaviour and objectives to help gain back balance within the relationship as a whole.

There possess however recently been some criticisms of early studies of relationships mainly because they do not consider individual developing changes which usually occur in lifestyle and that might alter the harmony in a relationship or place adequate focus on the effects of outdoors factors which will influence an individual’s thinking and consequent conduct within a relationship, such a household expectations, early on role modeling, messages received and joined with regarding the home from other folks such as father and mother. This can be specifically relevant in terms of negative thinking, pain avoidant behaviours, rule following and rigid thinking.

In terms of applying behaviour therapy to lovers counselling the therapist will need to look at what interpretations a client is making about a condition and the morals they keep based on prior experience and just how this then simply shapes their response or perhaps behaviour toward their spouse. They will look at where the idea was formed through a process of where? When? Who have? and What happened? questions in order to help reframe the past and detach this from the present thus helping the client’s view to change and become even more rational nowadays in this situation. In Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy a subset of CBT, using the ABC version, the theory distinguishes between rational and irrational beliefs and seeks to fix irrational values which result in self busting behaviours.

‘People are not disturbed by things; rather they will disturb themselves when they keep irrational beliefs about things. When they keep rational values they reply healthily to things’ CBT tips for a satisfying life Turbulent Dryden Hodder Education 2012

Studies of behaviour from your perspective of a Relational Frame Theory and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy can be used on understanding interactions issues and offer a slightly several perspectiveemphasising the nuances of language and how they impact function within a relationship and focussing on values and actions as being a priority with regards to repairing a harmonious relationship. RFT sees language and cognition since relational framework, an operant ability that develops through exposure to numerous verbal communications.

‘The objective of integrative behavioural couples therapy is to ‘help couples shift the context, instead of just the content material, of their connections, embracing issue as a part of human relationships and functioning toward a larger understanding and acceptance of each and every other’ ACTION & RFT in Associations Dahl, Stewart, Martell & Caplan Context Press 2013

There are many similarities in this way, for example applying RFT in the context of relationships looks at how persons derive expectations in interactions based on previously experiences and from viewpoints acquired before which lead to the generation of self rules and ideals of what the foreseeable future ‘should’ seem like and how someone ‘should’ act. The refined difference lies in the 2 key elements of Approval and Commitment Therapy, acknowledgement of internal events and commitment to values. It provides the couple the opportunity to determine self defeating patterns of behaviour, encouraging clients to embrace the painful areas of such unfavorable thinking with self compassion and to recognize that enduring and pain are inbuilt part of your life and additionally relationship encounter.

The therapist will help the clients to recognize values in every domains of life, maybe through the use of a Values Compass which determines 10 independent domains, Job, Leisure, Caregiving, Family, Personal Relations, Community Involvement, Spiritual techniques, Education and Personal Development, Health insurance and Social network. Customers will be urged to identify the reinforcing characteristics which support each site and to then simply rate just how highly they are really attending to each domain. This kind of exercise will help couples find where there might be imbalances.

By simply associating each value with it’s reinforcing qualities the clients can easily see for themselves and for each other just how balance in every domains is important to maintain harmony in their romantic relationship or how a lack of harmony might lead them to seek compensatory reinforcement from each other. By doing this exercise the individuals concerned can develop the understanding oftheir needs and just how they can obtain needs met. In understanding so why some regions of their lives have been neglected and recognising the home defeating behaviours which bring about this imbalance they develop self empathy and then prolong this to compassion and acceptance for every single other. From this kind of therapy couples learn to recognise and apply overall flexibility of thought and action, self empathy, compassion, popularity, mindfulness, self “as “context and values and fully commited action increasing the potential for stability within themselves and thus enabling a more assisting relationship with one another.

Whatever strategy a therapist takes you will have a recognition that the therapy will be more successful if it is all natural and integrative. The Chrysalis TIME style provides a appear basis from which to start most therapy. Also, it is essential for the therapist to consider the wider interpersonal implications and ethical concerns surrounding human relationships before going forward with any kind of therapeutic intervention. Ethnical differences, faith based beliefs, geographic origins, sociable status, educational backgrounds and family history most influence how an individual interprets a successful romance and set standards and guidelines for that romantic relationship and thus the way they might expect therapy to help when items go wrong.

1 key consideration in couples counselling which is more relevant in westernised society today is that a large number of relationships will be founded on like ” or perhaps an idea of affection, whereas in the past marriage deals were based in other factors just like status, economical security etc . For many people entering into a new marriage one of the driving a car factors are definitely the feelings and emotions derived from the behaviour of the other person. This since the basis to get a relationship can be not devoid of its’ challenges since primary highly billed emotions and feelings wane as a romance develops and matures and deeper cable connections are necessary for quality and longevity.

Also, it is essential that the therapist does apply relevant learning of consumer centred counselling to ensure that the treatment is client led and balanced, so that neither party feels the fact that therapist is usually lacking a position of neutrality, whilst preserving an empathic and understanding approach to both individuals. The skilled specialist will be conscious of the power balancebetween the 2 parties through very careful observation of body language and choice of vocabulary by the customers and effective attunement. They are going to maintain a technique of acceptance and non judgement though their clientele may not and may not always be drawn by simply one in the other or perhaps allow one to dominate the sessions. All parties must experience safe, show a willingness to engage along the way and have an obvious idea of, ideally, a distributed goal to get the therapy. A great ethical therapist will not observe couples consumers separately or perhaps set up lovers counselling in which they have recently counselled a single party.

You may even be interested in this: outline hypotheses and models of professional guidance