Good Morning Ms Leads to and class. Today I am doing my presentation on the Mabo Decision. A decision that was very significant in giving a massive boost towards the struggle for the recognition of Aboriginal terrain rights.
The Mabo decision was a no win no fee claim held in 1992 and is brief for Mabo and others v Queensland (No 2) (1992). On 06 3rd 1992, the substantial court of Australia shipped its landmark Mabo decision and rewrote the Aussie common legislation. The Substantial Court is definitely the highest courtroom in Australia’s judicial system.
The Mabo decision in the High The courtroom was the culmination of a legal battle started ten years previously by a selection of plaintiffs from the tiny Torres Strait isle of Dyrare to establish all their traditional title of the Murray Islands. The Mabo decision was given its name Eddie Mabo, the man who also challenged the Australian legal system and fought for recognition of the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as the regular owners with their land.
Radical and Torres Strait Islander peoples entertained Australia intended for 40, 000 to 62, 000 years before the British arrived in 1788. They chatted their own dialects and had their own laws and customs. In addition they had a solid connection to ‘country’ ” the Australian land. When the Uk arrived, that they declared that Australia was terra nullius (empty terrain ” or land that belongs to no person. As a result, Primitive and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ career of and unique connection with the area were not recognized, and the Uk took the land without agreement or payment. The Mer Islanders decided they would be the ones to problem the legal principle of terra nullius in the Large Court which Eddie Mabo would be the person to lead that action.
Eddie Koiki Mabo (29 06 1936 to 21 January 1992) was an Australian man through the Torres Strait Islands. Mabo’s love for his homeland drove the proud Torres Strait Islander to undertake a 10- year legal battle that rewrote Australia’s history. In 1981, Eddie Mabo made a speech at Adam Cook University or college in Queensland, where he explained his people’s beliefs regarding the ownership and gift of money of arrive at Mer. A legal professional heard the speech andasked Eddie in the event he would like to challenge the Australian Authorities in the courtroom system, to choose who the real owner of land on Mer was ” his people today belonging to the Australian Authorities. And this is precisely what Eddie Mabo would.
The Mabo case ran for 10 years. On a few June 1992, the Substantial Court of Australia decided that terra nullius should not have been used on Australia. This decision recognised that Original and Torres Strait Islander peoples possess rights to the land ” rights that existed ahead of the British came and can remain in existence today. The Mabo decision was a level for nice of Primitive and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ legal rights, because it acknowledged their unique reference to the terrain. It also resulted in the Aussie Parliament transferring the Indigenous Title Take action in 93. Sadly, Eddie Mabo never found out a result of his no win no fee claim. He perished in January 1992, only five several weeks before the Excessive Court manufactured its decision.
Mabo Day time occurs each year on Summer 3rd to commemorate Eddie Mabo and his incredible success to plan for native land legal rights led to a landmark decision of the Substantial Court of Australia that overturned the legal fiction of terra nullius about June third 1992. Eddie Mabo Jnr, on behalf of the Mabo family, said: We believe that a community holiday can be fitting to honour and recognise the contribution to the High Court decision of not only my and his co-plaintiffs, James Rice, Father Dave Passi, Mike Passi and Celuia Salee, but as well to accept all native Australians who have empowered and inspired one another.
Eddie Mabo made the incredibly courageous decision to stand for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Legal rights which developed into one of the best decisions for Australia’s Indigenous persons. Thank-you for listening.