Download now
Excerpt from Term Paper:
In contrast, the stoic philosopher Epictetus focused upon changing one’s mindset to accept the ways on the planet, rather than striving to change the world to achieve pleasure. Epictetus’ tone is considerably different than Plato’s. Rather than centering upon changing the framework of world, in his Enchiridion the Stoic philosopher instead focused upon bending the mind to accept no matter what life may well bring. Epictetus would without a doubt say to Avenirse that creating an ideal world is nearly impossible to achieve the truth is. Instead of the philosopher himself hoping after an excellent that cannot be created, it truly is far better to pay attention to how to reside in the present.
One likeness which Epictetus shares with Plato is the fact that that both are highly distrustful of common notions of happiness being equated with pleasure. Pleasure is seen as transient and dying. Being completely happy cannot be equated with getting material wealth or completing externally-directed desired goals. Epictetus’ philosophy seems very close to the comfort prayer that asks Our god to give a person the skills to change what can be changed, and the ability to accept what cannot be improved: “The items in our control are naturally free, unrestrained, unhindered; yet those not really in our control are fragile, slavish, controlled, belonging to other folks. Remember, in that case, that in case you suppose that points which are slavish by nature are usually free, and that what belongs to others is definitely your personal, then you will probably be hindered” (Epictetus 1).
Epictetus has an almost Buddhist beliefs, in the manner through which he seeks to bare the mind of fluxuations and yearnings, and also to accept anything and everyone with equanimity. “Remember that you are a great actor within a drama, of such a kind while the author pleases to make it. If short, of a short one; if perhaps long, of the long one. If it is his pleasure you should act an unhealthy man, a cripple, a governor, or a private person, see that you act it naturally. With this is your company, to act very well the character given you; to select it is another’s” (Epictetus 3). Striving for electricity means tiny: “When, therefore , you see any individual eminent in honors, or perhaps power, or in substantial esteem on any other bank account, take pay attention to not to end up being hurried aside with the physical appearance, and to enunciate him content; for, if the essence of good consists in things in our own control, there will be no room pertaining to envy or emulation” (Epictetus 4).
A few similarities exist between the philosophies of Escenario and Epictetus in the sense that neither feels that personal choice is the basis of delight. Both likewise share a commitment to excellence: Epictetus also counsels his visitors to act mindfully, and to spend themselves with zeal for all that they follow, otherwise they are like children pretending to be gladiators, warriors, or actors (Epictetus 5). Homework and a great unperturbed mind in the face of both extremities of grief and pleasures is exactly what matters. Although perfection can be not possible in this world, counsels the Stoic, and there is no suitable, other than the ideal that can be produced in the mind of tolerance and a really undisturbed spirit.
While very much can be learned from the kind of mindset cultivated by Epictetus, such unaggressive acceptance when confronted with fate also can create a culture in which injustices are perpetrated – for example , Epictetus advises not to accurate one’s servant to avoid disturbing one’s placid mind; he does not advocate resisting the practice of servitude. Escenario, in his enthusiasm for efficiency and harmony creates a world which surrender all autonomy and personal rights for the justice associated with an ideal world. Neither eyesight seems like an acceptable way to live one’s your life today.
Though individuals need to work together to create a community that is more encouraging of the delight at all, simply no Platonic community can eliminate choice to such a degree in the quest for perfect and maintain the delight of participants. For me, the truest way to happiness should be to cultivate the tolerance and balanced Stoic mindset, however be adequately mobilized against injustice i can use my entire life to achieve an increased purpose. Pleasure lies in producing a meaningful commitment to the world, and changing what can be altered for the better. A just contemporary society cannot be stationary, like the Republic, but should be responsive to transform and to householder’s expressed need for change
