Julius caesar by shakespeare

Category: History,
Topics: Julius Caesar,
Published: 11.02.2020 | Words: 566 | Views: 376
Download now

Julius Caesar, Play, Shakespeare

Within background it has been mentioned that when men seek power they will work with their words and activities to promote themselves. Whether that be through speeches, works of braveness, or marketing themselves through media. What and actions they use can make or break all their leadership. In the play Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare shows someone the effects of all those words. Julius Caesar can be described as tale of a leader betrayed by his close friend Brutus, by exploit their good friend Cassius. When Caesar was killed Brutus’s one work was to convince the colleagues that the killing was for the better and benefited the people of Rome. Though Mark Antony and Brutus’s speeches got similarities with the use of rhetorical and convincing devices, Brutus’s stood considerably above Brutus’s because of his use of Logos, Ethos, Solennité, and anaphora. Brutus and Mark Antony’s speech have many similarities. Something they both believe is that Caesar’s death was pertaining to the greater good and rewards the people of Rome. In Brutus’s speech he says “If then that friend require why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not which i loved Caesar less, nevertheless that I cherished Rome more. ” (JC 3. two 20. 22).

Need help writing essays?
Free Essays
For only $5.90/page
Order Now

Brutus is saying through this quote that he enjoys Caesar yet he really loves Rome that is certainly the reason he went against him. Brutus’s use of questions the teacher asks the class help get the crowd pondering, it also helps him connect his presentation to the masses. Brutus’s uses Logos which is logic often throughout his speech, he admits that “Censure me personally in your knowledge and awake your impression that you may always be the better judge” (JC 3. installment payments on your 16. 17). He uses this strategies to help persuade the people of rome. Brutus also runs on the lot of anaphoric phrases, which is very great for getting your way. Brutus says “Believe me for my very own honor, and have respect to mine reverance that you may believe. ” (JC 3. 2 . 14-15). He repeats this so many times to ensure the group knows how honorable he can. Honor is an extremely important thing to discuss because that may be one of the main issues the people of rome value. Some people assume that Mark Antonys speech is way better because of his use of questions the teacher asks the class. He says “I thrice presented him a kingly top, Which he did 3 times refuse. Was this aspirations? “. (JC 3. installment payments on your 95-96).

This issue really got the audience thinking about how humble Caesar was. Indicate Antony’s usage of rhetorical questions is very important throughout his speech mainly because once this individual gets the crowd thinking this individual gets all of them on his side. Another problem he asks is “What cause withholds you then to mourn pertaining to him? ” (JC three or more. 2 101-102). This issue causes the crowd to get feeling about the death of Caesar. To conclude the differences and similarities from the speeches acquired everything to perform with Brutus’s speech staying far more outstanding that Tag Antony’s. His use of trademarks, pathos, and ethos, and anophoric keyword phrases help him get the upper hand on his conversation. This goes to demonstrate that words can either make or break your management and make the crowd with or against you.