Law and ethics in wise blood vessels

Category: Literature,
Topics: Police officer,
Published: 11.02.2020 | Words: 1317 | Views: 620
Download now


Flannery O’Connor’s Wise Blood vessels addresses the laws and ethics of 20th 100 years America. Laws and values may seem to correlate, yet Wise Blood shows that this sort of is not always the case. Laws may claims to have honest origins and serve honest purposes, but Wise Bloodstream shows in any other case. The issue between legislation and integrity can be seen during Hazel Motes interaction together with the police officer plus the nonethical beginnings of laws can be seen in the bathroom Expression uses after stepping from the train. Law enforcement officer presents the detach between the particular law says and how legislation is unplaned, the bathroom shows the unethical basis of a few laws. In general, Wise Blood shows the relationship, or lack-thereof, between regulation and values.

Need help writing essays?
Free Essays
For only $5.90/page
Order Now

Laws and regulations and values first issue early in the novel once Hazel Terme is confronted by a police officer. Motes begins crossing a fastpaced street but the police officer prevents him and chastises him for jaywalking. Within this interaction between Expression, a regular resident, and the officer, a representative from the law, one can see how someone’s ethics are generally not always reflecting of regulating laws. Law enforcement officer statements to protect most races and genders equally, yet by his patterns and terminology suggest that he can a corrupt officer whom treats everybody, especially hispanics, poorly. Through his blatant disrespect from the police officer, Motes, an average citizen, shows how people admiration both the regulation and those who have enforce what the law states. This apparently small and straightforward interaction on the street part serves as a microcosm of 20th Century America.

O’Connor uses the police officer as a image of legislation in the mid-20th Century. The officer’s actions represent the federal government and its laws and regulations. Speaking of the traffic lighting, the police expert preaches equality to Motes. Speaking to Terme, the official says, “Maybe you believed the crimson ones was for white colored folks and the green types for niggers¦ Men and women, white colored folks and niggers, almost all go on precisely the same light” (41). The police officer claims that every people, no matter race and/or gender, are equal. This assertion might be true within the law, even so the police officer’s personal values, which as well represent the ethics from the government, signify not everyone is seen as or cured equally. The officer’s terminology and phrase choice display that Photography equipment Americans, and certain other minorities, are the same under the law, but not in the personal sight of many government bodies. The police official refers Caucasians as “white folks, ” but when speaking of African Us citizens, he uses the derogatory “nigger” rather than “black folks” or any various other nondiscriminatory term. The police officer’s reference to Africa Americans in comparison to Caucasians demonstrates a person’s integrity may be in conflict with the regulations they comply with or enforce. The police official also shows how legitimate authority can easily corrupt someone’s ethics.

The power the officer possesses has gone to his head. He speaks down to Motes in a very supercilious tone. Though he has the intent of enforcing legislation for Motes’ safety, the officer turns the simple conversation into a stage show for people to find out. Rather than correcting Motes’ unlawful actions, the officer uses sarcasm so that they can be funny and captivate a gathering crowd. His job is to uphold the law, but the police officer chooses to do something more like an entertainer or maybe a comedian. The officer gets the ethical responsibility to impose the law, yet his actions show how said responsibility has morally corrupted him. In contrast to the police officer, Hazel Motes represents the average citizen. Motes’ interactions with the legislation and its enforcer begin to problem the regulations themselves. Motes blatantly and knowing destroys the law facing a officer. Laws are created to protect residents yet Expression puts himself at risk rather than waiting for the sunshine to change. Motes’ actions query the ethicality of the rules, and the specialist of all laws and regulations in general. Laws and regulations have no goal if people do not comply with them. Eventually, people choose whether or not to have ethically.

Further, Hazel Motes also ignores the officer’s repeated whistles whilst crossing the street during a quit light and Motes then lies for the officer when he claims to obtain never found the light. A number of ethical concerns arise. This interaction concerns whether or not 1 must pay attention to an expert figure that is cynical, rude, and ethically corrupt. Motes’ words and actions demonstrate that cops have no particular right to always be sarcastic, bluff, or condescending. The pompous police officer receives the same treatment he is supplying, and as an agent of the law, he must become held to the next ethical regular. Neither Expression nor the police officer values the other man, poor people relationship among citizens and laws is highlighted within the interaction between Motes and the police officer. Competition is obviously an issue for the police officer. He non-chalantly repeats the word “nigger” several times. States to support municipal rights nevertheless his character suggests or else. This unequal, unethical treatment of African People in the usa comes from what the law states.

Underhanded laws regarding race are noticed at the beginning of Phase 2 . Racism and segregation are evidently presented while issues in the town by which Motes is from. Motes’ enters a bathroom with a sign reading “MEN’S TOILET. WHITE-COLORED. ” (26). Those who required the segregation of the bathrooms would believe white folks are superior to different races, but upon even more inspection with the bathroom condition, their discussion fails to withstand. The law looks for to keep Africa Americans distinct from Caucasians because that may be what is considered as the ethical thing to do, however , the truth is, this is clearly an unethical legislation. Most of the Caucasian characters shown in the story are clearly no ethical role models to be implemented. The white-only bathrooms are generally not the area of purity that they can be made out to be. The room was once “a bright pleasant yellow” (26) when it first opened, although human interference corrupted this to become “nearly green and [decorated] with handwriting and with various thorough drawings with the parts of the body of both males and women” (26). The restroom was also polluted by various other doodles in addition to the names and addresses of local prostitutes (26). The Caucasians of Wise Blood believe they may be ethically, and generally, superior to minorities, yet their particular actions show otherwise. A lot of the Caucasians, inspite of a significant range of them assuming themselves a lot better than other contests, behave in unethical techniques. This is particularly seen in Hazel Motes’ visit to the whites-only bathroom, Caucasians do not possess the ethical high ground they claim to have got.

The seemingly-close romance between integrity and laws is evaluated within Flannery O’Connor’s Sensible Blood. Many events happen that query and evaluate the ethicality of regulations as well as the professionalism and morality of those who have enforce the laws. Hazel Motes’ connection with the hurtful, supercilious police officer shows how a law may claim to be ethical, but it can be just like unethical because the man or perhaps woman trying to enforce that. Similarly, the supposed moral basis of laws is called into question when ever Motes makes its way into the disgusting, vandalized white-only restroom. No African Us citizens, a ethnicity group considered to be less civilized than Caucasians, are allowed into the bathroom, yet the immaturity and disrespect of Caucasians is seen in the bathroom graffiti. Flannery O’Connor’s Wise Bloodstream presents a critical look at the poor relationship among ethics and laws in 20th 100 years America.