Mockingjay reflection article

Category: Society,
Published: 20.02.2020 | Words: 586 | Views: 430
Download now

Brainwashing, or hijacking, is the biggest scientific moral issue in Suzanne Collin’s Mockingjay. The main persona, Peeta, can be brainwashed by Capitol following he is kidnapped from a mishap inside the 75 craving for food games. The Rebellion preserved him at some time after that then when he observed and attemptedto strangle Katniss they understood something was wrong. The Rebels found that the Polish capitol had been using genetically built animals, tracker jackers, to poison Peeta and control his brain to make him hate and try to kill Katniss.

The Capitol applied the toxin to alter Peeta’s memories involving Katniss and be him up against the girl he has been in love with his expereince of living. The Rebellion took actions and started out trying to hijack him backside using a identical method. Peeta never delivered to the method he used to be precisely for a long time, the brainwashing had lasting results on him. In the end both sides of the warfare used a form of brainwashing to get Peeta to act how they wanted.

Need help writing essays?
Free Essays
For only $5.90/page

Brainwashing have been tried often in experiments by many organizations including the CIA based on several drugs and methods.

The tests were never very successful but as science moves along there is a likelihood that brainwashing could become real. Mockingjay portrays that the brainwashing was made by altering the memories in the affected. It absolutely was based which has a genetically manufactured poison that acted like a hallucinogen which allowed the capitol to tamper with all the memories the fact that patient was recalling. This technique made the brainwashed person act just as intended because their memory was improved. Using a related method governments could use this really is a multitude of techniques, good and bad.

The ethics included in the practice of brainwashing would be very hard to justify, entirely changing how a person thinks and acts just isn’t ethical. The main idea at the rear of brainwashing is definitely harmless enough, it can be as easy as getting everyone to agree with you all the time. Maybe even producing everyone think you accomplished a accomplishment no one believed was feasible. More really, it could actually make people totally turn their very own back on a lifelong friend. Brainwashing is definitely harmless until it gets taken out of control ith a bad objective behind it.

For example , controlling a president to perform their nation into the ground and produce civil warfare could be regarded as unethical. I think that because of how uncontrollable the human competition is, working on a way to brainwash people will probably be unethical. There may be some usefulness to the practice of brainwashing but it will be almost impossible to never let it enter into the wrong hands. It could be was used to getting information out of agents and will force protection to be stronger.

It would end up being useful to rehabilitate convicted felons to help them manage to get thier life backside on track. Also, it could help addicts to help get over their addiction and move on is obviously. I think the main topic of weather to use it or not might be a big debate in countries. Brainwashing can be helpful but also harmful to individuals involved and the question in the ethics from it is up pertaining to debate, although personally I believe it is an dishonest practice because of how unmanageable humans could be.

1