Good Leadership Is More Important Than Good Management Essay

Category: Administration,
Published: 30.12.2019 | Words: 2666 | Views: 383
Download now

Management and managing are crucial elements that determine the company’s further expansion. Management tries to control almost everything even individuals, whereas commanders attempt to liberate humans and powers (Kotter 2001). Generally, the work administration does should be to make plan and finances, organize, control and resolve the problem.

The goal of management should be to set up the rules. The leader’s work should be to ensure the direction and target from the company, combine all the methods, impel and encourage staff, its goal is to transform, and it is obviously that this may be the way leadership runs (Kotter 2001). Even more specially, management cares about the worthiness and meaningfulness, whether the focus on the organization features achieved will be worth or certainly not.

Need help writing essays?
Free Essays
For only $5.90/page
Order Now

Leadership employs closely to humans, the dignity, benefit, potential and development. In the event that management can be concentrate on technology and means, procedures and methods, then leadership place emphasis on humanity and aim, the effects and art (Northouse 2007). For example , managing is concentrate on the function of electrical power, but leadership cares the effect of enchantment.

In fact , for each organization actually country, they want both management and administration. The aim cannot be achieved if lacking a single of these two. Since the management is playing the direction teacher role inside the management method, this dissertation believes leadership is more essential.

Therefore , the essay will certainly first possess a books review in leadership and management, next that, it is going to explain the interdependence of both two functions. Finally, it will demonstrate the reason why leadership is more crucial through good examples. Many studies have research about leadership and management by different point of view. According to Kotter (2001), the meaning of management is usually dealing with the assigned activity, managers do key functions such as organizing, organizing and controlling, then achieve the expected objective. Through supervision, the current corporation performance can be maintained effectively (Cuban 1988).

It is certainly that in the administration process, the leadership will always exhibits, nevertheless the main features of supervision is preservation rather alter (Bush & Heystek 2003). Both of administration and command have their exceptional value to various conditions, however , supervision deals with the technical problems while management deals with ideals (Bush and Heystek 2003). According to Kouzes and Posner (2002), leadership is the ability how the leader stimulates others to volunteer to generate efforts for the organization.

For leadership, it has five following styles: residential area management, staff management, business man managing, impoverished supervision, and authority obedience (Blake & Agnelet 2003). Between these five styles, “team management” is usually proposed many. Blake and Mouton (2003) think the leadership is definitely the ability to manage both development and individuals, and crew management is among the most appropriate a single. In terms of Fiedler (1967), the problem has more influence on management.

Three primary situations will be leader affiliate relationship, the structure of the mission as well as the authority electricity. Different condition will show different leadership. Furthermore, all these 3 divisions likewise have impact on the leadership.

Tannenbaum and Schmidt (1958) conclude four primary styles, autocratic, known as the telling style, the leader takes the mission and let it recognized to the group; persuasive (the selling style), the leader want to motivate the group without discussion, just through persuading them to believe that the tasks is a superb chance; consultative (the asking style), the best will consider member’s guidelines and their thoughts when facing the decisions; democratic (the joining style), the leader is going to invite dialogue, in this step the leader is not just a decision maker. Presently, the way the organization can adapt to the fast changing society has turned into a critical trouble for people to consider.

In such a competitive era which can be compete about knowledge (Bell 1999), a business, particularly an enterprise which in turn wants to gain the long lasting success should certainly focus on the two leadership and management, in this manner to adapt to the changing world and maintain the competitive advantage (Welch, J & Welch, H 2005). Although the leadership and management are diverse, both of they are very crucial to the corporation and communicate each other. Consequently , the organization requirements both the aim view by managers and vision brought by the market leaders (Bolman & Deal 1997). For reaching the vision and keeping very efficient of the organization, it is necessary to pay great attention to both management and supervision.

The interdependent relationship among leadership and management could be illustrated through balanced scoreboard (Kaplan & Norton 2005) shown inside the following physique. The Banlance Scorecard (Kaplan & Norton 2005) Based on the figure previously mentioned, it looks in the key area of a business, exterior area just like consumers, financial performance, internal one such while innovation and learning procedure. It obviously shows a comprehensive view in the two capabilities. Managers ought to use considerable methods to have got a profound understanding of consumers’ demands, and leader will need to give the firm goal with these needs.

Managers must use virtually any internal business strategy to allow the consumer pleased while commanders are give all the helps that reach that strategy. So underneath nowadays such a brutal globalized competition, every firm wants to keep the consumers and market share. And so the managers and leaders will be pretty interdependent, with market leaders are responsible for search the demand to adapt the alter, and managers control the process and give guidelines.

It is thus clear great leadership and good administration are very essential aspects of a company, however begins from the key esprit in the firm, leadership represents the excellence from the enterprise, and it could recognize the value of every employee. Management needs sustained training and creation, it is regard because the key elements that impact the development, substitute and reproduce of an organization. Based on this kind of understanding, compared with good supervision good command is a even more critical issue.

Following section will take Volvo and P&G as circumstances to explain why leadership is far more important than management. Sony is a leading firm inside the high-tech produces industry, this first grows the recollection stick and MP3 player, nevertheless sales earnings did not efficiency well. And soon after the emerging of Samsung and Apple, Volvo was shortly surpassed by two competition. Samsung recieve more brand worth than Fiat since 2005, and the Ipod touch and Macbook from Apple are popular rather than Vaio (Chang 2008). Actually a good like Sony who can conduct on the intercontinental stage can of course have a good supervision within the firm for so far Sony still do a very good work.

And from the external environment, the different tactics Sony and Samsung usually takes will not bring about the different performance on its sales. Fiat has the right strategy, the whole resources, the powerful energy, but the victor turns to Apple and Samsung. Why Sony can so very easily be overtaken by the competitors? The main reason why this sort of gap is out there is because the company lacks in the leadership. A large number of enterprises failed due to the lost integration of strategy and operation.

Have Sony’s competition with Apple as an example, Apple has no key technology within the MP3 player industry, all the things they are doing is to put into action the innovation with its computer processor technology. But in the contrast, though Sony offers every aspect to accomplishment, the wrong actions results in the lost inside the MP3 player market. Sony required defensive approach rather than unpleasant one, these kinds of strategy is not ideal to its market and organizational administration.

There are two characteristic of current market: the rapid modify of new technology and the quickly depreciation of old kinds. Sony really do little work to face both the emerging companies, the new head team organized by the formal president of Sony could not meet their new visions. Why Apple and Korean could win is not only since they know the market pattern and significance of innovation, nevertheless also for the reason that right perspective from the market leaders. The eyesight is not only a dream yet based on the careful market analysis and knowledge of current organizational circumstance.

This is the reason Sony failed inside the competition and meanwhile in addition, it shows the greater importance of leadership than administration. Senge (1994) said that a competent leadership is that the leader may change the course of an organization’s development and destiny, mainly because every success eventually depends upon what leaders. P&G, a global good company in FMCG (Fast Moving Customer Goods) market, their leadership management is a good experience to understand. There has a rule in P&G, inter-dependence is a life-style (McDonald 2009).

Every office, products and areas among the organization should trust each other and closely cooperate. P&G is proud of getting the accomplishment if have other’s guidelines. The rule shows P&G has help to make a strongly partnership with their suppliers, consumers, communities and employees.

In this manner, P&G has built an entire easy value sequence and leads to a multiple- win scenario. Good leadership shown in P&G Organization as next: Friendly and long-term cooperation with associates. P&G’s command with partners could be displayed as they usually built a long-term relationship.

Many associates think P&G has enough respect toward its associates. The reason P&G seldom change partners is caused by two causes: first is within this way to hold the brand picture, second is P&G hopes the associates should be familiar with P&G’s organization, thus they can reduce a lot costs and time. Ground breaking cooperate approach. P&G’s another leadership performs to be creative cooperation with Wal-Mart. The moment many producers are lamented about big retail stores such as Wal-Mart and Carrefour, P&G always have an effort position in the bargaining with all the retailers.

P&G make an development on its supply sequence. They use the information technology to understand the ongoing replenishment system, which control the products simply by categories. The team from P&G and Wal-Mart are coming from many departments such as revenue, marketing, procedure, IT and finance, but they share similar goal.

Inside the cooperate procedure, P&G cautiously absorb the advices in the retailers as well as, P&G style some items for Wal-Mart. The two firms also want to expand their very own business in to other areas. Provide training and communication with employees.

P&G regards persons as their wealth. P&G present systematic training curriculum, internal promotion. Most of the administration is enrolling internally; this kind of basically improved the employee’s loyalty.

Besides, P&G not only provide a competitive wages, nevertheless also their comfortable office. All these are the elements that may show P&G performance in leadership. P&G takes more social responsibility. Aims at lasting management and environment security, from 1994, P&G might release it is global environment reports for the public yearly. Its concentrate on is to show a clear vision of the company’s work for enhancing the global environment.

Commitment to consumers. P&G’s belief is usually they develop and offer top quality products in order to improve the existence of global buyers. As returns, they will initial gain the main market position and raising profit, as a result to make the culture prosperity which will our workers, stakeholders functions and comes from. P&G place customers because the initial position; they listen to their particular suggestions, which include sales and R&D. P&G set the free demand consumers so that connection with buyers, they always think and solve the down sides from customers perspective and explore the potential demands.

3E model. The 3E type of P&G is usually ultimately a great indication with their works on management. The 3E model contains: envision, energize, enable. Picture encourages individuals to have an obvious plan and strategy toward their targets, concentrate on achieve the goal; get the possibility rather than the limitations. Energize inspire employees to listen, figure out and trust, approve the employee’s overall performance.

Enable increase employees productivities. And also make possible conditions for employees to get achievement. The 3E model seems very simple but it has included everything related to the command.

In this style, leadership can be described as behavior not a job. This clearly gives three tasks to the managers: setting the goal, inspiring the employees, offer any assists. From all of these aspects of P&G case, persons can know that leadership is not only depends on one person or one particular group, this rely on the entire organization. And leadership not merely considers to get small aspects such as company strategies, nevertheless also looks at more about the interpersonal responsibility it have in the society. In most cases, there are 3 outcomes of fantastic leadership: -The productivity.

The only results when the employees are not able to finish his job in time are the waste of time and the reduction of quality. The main reason of such effect is the unsure guidance and follow-ups. If the leader simply cannot offer assistance the employees need, then the work cannot accomplish the predicted level.

So lots of time and strength will be wasted therefore reduced the productivity. -The stability within the organization. Since said previously mentioned, the current society is based on expertise. If the business wants to approve the value of employees, it should offer continuous teaching and growing opportunities on their behalf.

In this way to demonstrate the agencies confirmation on their value through spending time and money make investments on the knowledge. The company might use such solution to increase the steadiness of the staff and improve the efficiency. -The consumer’s fulfillment. The excellent external consumer services are based on the interior customer service. If the company could realize that the employees are the essential customers for these people, then they could get the chance to generate huge profit.

As a leader, the company’s attitude for the employees primarily determines whether or not they wish to help the company. To care the employees give the firm a chance to provide an excellent buyer services from inside-out. Striper and Avolio (1994) pointed out that the command should include actions like impressive others, perceptive stimulation, training and advancement, respect and faith. This paper believes, the leadership is, within the organization’s process of implement their target, the power of the leader influence other related be led and the conversation between innovator and the that you be led.

The leadership itself is not only a capacity but the process. In the process, it includes the process of onstruct a binary relationship between the leader and followers, and also contains the features leader established the organization, increase the efficiency, and leaders help organization adapt the environment, develop and progressive process.? Realization To sum up, great management is likewise an important issue concerning the organizational development. The key reason why leadership is somewhat more important is that leadership can be on a higher-level.

Take using the horses as case in point; if the stableman has an good technique to control the horse, perhaps the stableman has managing talent. But if he constantly goes to an incorrect direction, frankly, though the high technique of his managing, but still cannot achieve the prospective, then he could be doing the incorrect thing. Clawson (2008) stated that leadership is usually nothing in the event without changes.

So underneath nowadays a fiercely global trend competition and rapid changing details and technology, leadership turns into more important to get the organization. Yet only incorporate the power of both of these functions may, the organization develop on the right way.