Traits in the Leadership Process Essay

Category: Leadership,
Published: 07.11.2019 | Words: 4102 | Views: 485
Download now

Almost every author that has researched and written about the leadership agrees that it is one of the important issues in company science. Hogan, Gordon and Hogan (2002) posit that in terms of the quantity of printed internet pages devoted to a subject, leadership positions as one of the most significant issues in applied mindset.

In the same light, George (2002) states that the matter of command has been dealt with from a multitude of dimensions, research workers have examined what leaders are like, them or don’t do, the way they motivate their very own followers, how their variations interact with situational conditions, the way they effect changes in their corporation and lots more. Despite this extensive approach to leadership and huge human body of knowledge accrued over several decades of research, leadership still looks poorly understood. This is evidenced by the insufficient any normal definition.

Need help writing essays?
Free Essays
For only $5.90/page
Order Now

It truly is clear, yet , that irrespective of the definition or perhaps dimension used, leadership can be described as the process of motivating, encouraging or perhaps persuading visitors to drop all their personal hobbies, for a period of time, and work at the accomplishment of a group goal. Hogan, Gordon and Hogan (2002) assert that leadership is approximately persuasion and motivation and never domination. They opine that the process of command only arises when individuals willingly undertake, for a period of time, the desired goals of a group as their individual and work at it success.

It is obvious from the above the fact that person and personality of the leader plays pivotal part in the performance and accomplishment of the command process. The importance of attributes in the leadership process continues to be severally analyzed under several theoretical stance, be it the charismatic, life changing or servant leadership hypotheses, what is essential is that certain abilities, capabilities and qualities of the head influences the leadership procedure. The purpose of this kind of paper should be to identify these characteristics and also to highlight all their importance in the leadership procedure.

As explained earlier, command is a topic that has to the credit countless research magazines, magazine and newspaper content; for example Morris and colleagues (2005) reported that a fundamental search with the word leader’ in the ABI/Inform search engine yielded 388, 122 documents, 55, 947 that were in scholarly periodicals with the leftover appearing in magazines, trade magazines, newspapers, and assorted reports (Morris ain al., 2006 p. 1324). Despite this kind of huge volumes of academic and research work on the topic, the word leader and leadership continue to suffers from the challenge of explanation (Smith ain al., 2004).

Each publisher defines the subject base in the theoretical posture; however , some authors have attempted to supply a basic strength definition for the term command. In this regard, Lehman (2007) in his ZimNotes called leadership a great influence method. He specifies it because the ability to encourage others to complete something, consider something or act a specific way’, although Garner (2007) defines leadership as the ability to determine what is to be done and after that to receive others to actually want to do it’; the management process, hence, involves achieving such goals or targets.

Looking at management from a slightly different point of view, Barker (2001) argues that leadership can be described as process which is not specifically an event of the person in charge, that leadership is a function in the wills and individual needs plus the result of the dynamics of collective can organized to meet those numerous needs. Using this standpoint, the author posits that leadership then can be defined as a process of transformative alter where the integrity of individuals happen to be integrated into the mores of any community as a way of major social development (Barker, 2001 p. 491).

In psychology, trait is usually described as the stable attributes of an specific; it details the totality of the internal make-up of the individual, what he is able of doing and exactly how he is competent of operating. From this explanation, it is noticeable that an individual’s trait potentially lasts throughout life. Regarding this, several experts have attemptedto highlight the different traits that mark an innovator out because an effective and successful leader.

Because people posses diverse and differing traits, it truly is somehow challenging to completely identify traits which make for powerful leadership. Kirkpatrick and Locke were credited with determining six traits that are considered to influence the leadership procedure and identify the effective leader from all other people; these types of traits included drive, inspiration, honesty and integrity, self assurance, cognitive ability, and knowledge of business (Barker, 2001). Mainly because it is almost impossible to create an exhaustive set of the required traits for powerful leadership, as a result of cultural in addition to most parts, contextual constraints, different creators have typically singled out several traits to go over, depending on their very own theoretical bending.

Vogan (2007) identifies vision, passion, capacity to make decisions, team building, plus the right personality as qualities vital to leadership. Lehman (2007) argues for vision, ability to stimulate, emotional cleverness, empowering other folks, trustworthiness, emphasis and solid will, as important qualities for leadership. George (2002) extensively mentioned the importance of emotional intelligence and how it influences the leadership process, while Morris et approach (2005) mentioned humility in leadership, Shamir et ing (2001) reviewed motivation and vision, and May et approach (2003) reviewed moral beliefs. For the purpose of this paper, the influence of emotional brains, vision and motivation, moral values and humility upon leadership method shall be reviewed.

Maslow collection the level of the examine of human motivation if he argued that human’s requirements are in hierarchy which range from the most basic physiological needs of living, through safety, social esteem and on higher airplanes, self actualization. It is argued that an individual is encouraged by his current need and as that require is achieved, he goes up to the next higher need. In every firm, the leader must be able to motivate his subordinates through the spirit of a noble cause’, the importance and significance of the communautaire goal more than selfish personal needs and desires.

Generally there exist an array of motivational methods that a innovator can take up, what is very important to this discourse is that the leader must have got the ability and capacity to let loose the passion for a collective objective in his subordinates (Owston, 2005). Every man enjoys the fulfillment that comes with a job congratulations, a goal or perhaps objective accomplished or a quest accomplished, so long as they believe inside the goal, goal or mission. The ability of your leader to inspire such beliefs inside the collective goal differentiates an efficient leader coming from an unproductive one.

Irrespective of the leadership style or procedure under talk, it is evident that zero style of command will make it through without the ability to motivate followership. The most basic definition of leadership entails the ability or perhaps process with which an individual excites others to lay their particular personal desires aside and beneath the communautaire goal, and work together on the achievement of such desired goals. Through determination, a leader can get his subordinates to believe in him as well as the collective target, a leader may bring out the best lawn mowers of his subordinates, the leader also can create a the drive to achieve the goal and a sense of fulfillment, in the subordinates, when the objective is attained.

Therefore , if the leadership procedure involves modifying individuals in the drive toward selfish individual pursuits in a team of folks wiling to work selflessly generously, liberally for the achievement of a collective objective, then determination is the application or catalyst that supports such transformative change (Barker, 2001). Nevertheless , as important as determination is, in leadership, zero leader can easily fully tap into its potentials without the capability to form crystal clear, communicable and passionate thoughts that people will probably be willing to identify with.

Effective leadership requires the fact that leader should be able to get pregnant visions that everyone can understand, the leader must be able to articulate and communicate the eye-sight to the affiliates. Visions with no ability to communicate them will not likely achieve the desired goal. A powerful leader is not merely only capable to conceive and plan ahead, he must also be able to put these kinds of visions in words, for every member of they to understand. An innovator that can have a baby admirable dreams, communicate this kind of visions to everyone included and rise enough interest in everybody to follow through such thoughts, succeeds (Vogan, 2007). George (2002) thoroughly discussed the role and importance of thoughts and psychological intelligence in the leadership method.

In analyzing the position of traits in command, emotion makes up an important aspect. This is because the majority of human qualities are motivated and molded by individual’s emotional cleverness. Moreover, while indicated by simply George (2002), the term emotional intelligence is known as a relatively new coins that has arrive to describe a number of social and psychological qualities once interpreted as social intelligence’.

Nevertheless , in contrast to the earlier concept of interpersonal intelligence, psychological intelligence even more succinctly details internal and feelings that influence functioning, which may not necessarily be associated with social skills. At the same time, psychological intelligence likewise focuses on psychological skills necessary for effective leadership, without increasing these with social skills, which are for the most part contextually limited.

While psychological intelligence have been completely variedly referred to as gut instinct’ or innate sense with what others will be feeling’, George (2002) details it while the ability to perceive emotions, to get into and generate emotions, to be able to assist thought, to understand thoughts and emotional knowledge, and also to reflectively regulate emotions to be able to promote mental and perceptive growth’. It is argued that emotional cleverness describes the ability to effectively joins emotions with reasoning, applying emotions to facilitate thinking and reasoning intelligently about emotions’ (p. 1033). Just how then really does emotional brains influence the leadership process?

In giving an answer to this question, the author determines four significant aspect of psychological intelligence and highlight just how each independently and jointly, influence management. The several aspects of emotional intelligence identified includes: the appraisal and expression of emotion, the utilization of emotion to enhance cognitive techniques and decision making, knowledge about thoughts, and management of thoughts. Appraisal and expression of emotions has to do with both the do it yourself and others. Differing people have various abilities in terms of understanding their particular emotions, plus the extent to which they verbally or non-verbally express their particular emotions in front of large audiences.

The author states that the ability to accurately appraise one’s thoughts facilitates the usage of emotional type in forming judgments and making decisions. Most importantly for this discourse, a chance to effectively communicate emotions, verbally or nonverbally, to others is known as a major requirement of leaders to communicate their visions, article topics and desires to the team members. An effective head is not only capable to accurately identify his feelings and thoughts; he is as well able to efficiently communicate these kinds of to subordinates.

The passion in such phrase of feelings and visions carries ensures the determination of subordinates required to accomplish such goals. Besides understanding and expressing one’s feelings, the ability to appreciate others emotions make for successful leadership. A leader that is able to prefer the emotions of his subordinates understands how to make use of the emotional improvements experienced simply by subordinates in motivating all of them towards achieving the collective target. Further, as emotional brains is important for understanding and expressing one’s emotions, but also in also employing these feelings in useful ways.

Emotions can be useful when it comes to directing attention to pressing problems and signaling what needs to be the focus of attention; they can be found in choosing between options and making decisions, for example , being able to anticipate just how one would experience if certain events occurred can help decision makers select among multiple options; feelings can also be used to facilitate specific kinds of intellectual processes, for example , positive feelings facilitates creativeness, integrative thinking, and inductive reasoning, whilst negative moods facilitates awareness of detail, recognition of mistakes and concerns, and careful information processing (George, 2002 p. 1036). A leader that understands how the different moods influence intellectual processes is often more effective simply by evaluating similar opportunity, issue or problem under varying moods, thus creating several viable ways of addressing the situation.

Besides, a leader that is psychologically stable can more quickly earn the trust and loyalty of subordinates, when he is seen as reliable and dependable. Emotional expertise is concerned with understanding both determinants and consequences of moods and emotions, and exactly how they develop and change with time. In is actually a known fact that people change with respect to their very own understanding of how different situations, events, persons and other stimuli induce thoughts, a leader that fully understand this kind of relationship, can really motivate subordinates and the form of emotions to expect under different situations.

For example , a leader that may be surprised that his subordinates’ initial reaction to an released restructuring is definitely fear and anxiety is definitely not familiar with the determinants of thoughts. An psychologically knowledgeable leader knows what emotions to anticipate and how to adjust such emotions for the collective good. Management of emotions is additionally an important device in the management process. Market leaders that can properly manage, not merely their thoughts, but the feelings of others accomplish greater and consistent success.

The ability to motivate and enthuse other people or make them feel cautious and careful, is an important tool for sociable influence, as leadership consists of influencing individuals to join you in obtaining an organizational objective, the best must be in a position to mange the emotions of his subordinates in order to accomplish the desired goals. Highlighting the interrelationship between four factors emotional intellect discussed previously mentioned and how they will collectively influence the command process, George (2002) contend that effective and good leadership entails the following factors: And in most of these elements, thoughts and psychological intelligence enjoy an influential part.

For example , by making use of their thoughts to enhance their information processing of the issues, threats, issues, and possibilities facing all their organizations, emotional intelligence can assist the leader develop compelling visions that subordinates will quickly identify with. Also, leaders ought to understand and influence followers’ emotions so that they are mindful of the serious mother nature of challenges yet, presented the leader’s vision, are enthusiastic about solving the problems and feel optimistic about personal contributions.

It truly is thus apparent that the capacity to create visions, motivate people to identify with the vision and follow it through, create and maintain constant eagerness and self-confidence about achieving the set target and the capacity to involve both sides in a adaptable decision making procedure are all affected by the emotional intelligence in the leader. Morris and co-workers (2005) offered an extensive analysis on the generally overlooked characteristic of humbleness influences the leadership method. The authors contend that humility, in contrast to the general viewpoint, is a sophisticated construct that subsumes a wide array of traits.

Citing from Comte-Sponville (2001), they will suggested that humility needs to be envisioned since the science from the self, as sincere humility arises from a comprehensive understanding of one’s strengths and weaknesses. Out of this view, consequently , humility is usually borne from the awareness of what one is and what is not. Extending this disagreement, Peterson and Seligman (2004) suggest that humbleness should be best seen as a great human trait that is both stable and enduring, although sometimes vunerable to situational impact on.

From this the law, two points turn into evident; a single, humility does not involve self-disparagement or disbelief, only a desire to consider an objective consider the self, and two, humbleness implies a willingness to see the self effectively and not using the attainment of accuracy (Morris et approach, 2005 s. 1330). In sum, humility can be defined as a personal orientation founded on a willingness to find the self effectively and a propensity to place oneself in perspective, devoid of falling into the extremes of neither self-abasement nor excessively positive self-regard. ‘ (Morris et ‘s, 2005 g. 1331).

With this definition, three distinctive but related themes arise from humility; self consciousness understanding one’s power and weak spot; openness knowing that some things are further than one’s control and knowing ones imperfection; transcendence the ability to rise above one’s restrictions and developing connection to a bigger perspective. So how does humility influence the leadership method? Humility bears close romance with the notion of servant leadership’.

Infact it is argued that Greenleaf’s idea of servant leadership is that leadership should be approached from a non focal position and really should seek to match the objectives of the organization as well as members, rather than maximize personal ambition. To get humble leaders, organizational interests take priority over personal interests, and rather than performing self satisfaction or panegyrique, the humble innovator can better relate with his subordinates towards facilitating the betterment in the collective interests. It is also asserted that humility in command bears close relationship with all the emerging notion of authentic leadership’.

According to Avolio fantastic associates (2004) in suggesting the concept, genuine leaders show self-awareness, including being able to: accurately assess their very own strengths and weaknesses, know, accept and remain true to themselves, and acknowledge their particular limitations. Inside the same problematic vein, humility probably will help frontrunners in participating in objective home examination and also to accept what ever short comings they locate in themselves. Might and others (2003) extend this kind of argument one step further. They noted that effective commanders are simple by nature. That humility decreases leader’s desire to be the center of focus and attention, somewhat they will choose to remain in the setting and strive to have credit given to followers.

In sum, mcdougal argues that humility is definitely the cornerstone of not only servant leaders, yet also transformational leadership and others styles of command. Explaining this kind of correlation, the authors posit that transformational leadership consist of four discrete segments; first, leaders need to act as a task model to get subordinates by engaging in honest and meaningful conducts, showing risks and considering the requirements of others prior to self; these kinds of earn respect, trust and admiration for the leader. Two, leaders must provide intellectual stimulation to get followers, by encouraging creativity, out from the box’ pondering.

Thirdly, frontrunners must stay away from apportioning blames to subordinates, a leader must admit problems, include subordinates in the id and fixing of concerns without wanting to be the know all’. Lastly, commanders must provide individualized focus on subordinates and continually expanding the expertise and intellect of subordinates by delegating tasks and responsibility to subordinates. It can be apparent that humility plays a pivotal role in at least three from the four attributes of frontrunners identified over.

Humble commanders act as position models simply by creating the path, vision and goals for the group, without automatically putting self interest previously mentioned collective goals or seeking self panegyrique. The very easily earn the respect and emulation of subordinates since they work selflessly, and admits that they will be imperfect, therefore sharing in failures, instead of passing the bulk’ to subordinates. The concept of humility closely ties while using moral capacity of the innovator.

It is recognized that to be a leader, one particular must be capable to influence other folks to voluntarily participate in obtaining collective objectives. A leader should be able to gain the respect, admiration and emulation of his subordinates; however , this will likely not become the case without sound ethical capacity. Meaning capacity, also called moral values is not really an important facet of leadership research, however , it can be established that without audio moral ideals, the success of any kind of leader will be short lived.

The achievements of organizations led by morally sound and upright leaders sticks out because the superior performance from the organization can be sustained over a long period of time, even following such market leaders have retired or vacated that placement. Bennis (2006) believes the moral potential can be stated in several ways, display of sincerity of purpose, sincerity and sinceridad in all actions, for example makes the leader respect and trust, should meaningful principles that are consistent with actions, self confidence, reasonable and broad mindedness, bravery and straightforwardness are ideals that endear the leader for the hearts from the subordinates, a great deal that his visions turns into theirs, his passion is easily communicated and his faults happen to be readily forgotten.

In conclusion, it is obvious that it is not possible to exhaustively discuss all the attributes that effect the command process, since some characteristics are influenced by in-text factors while some are not, some traits will be permanent and unchanging, while others are created with years of experience. Yet , it is presumed that several traits enjoy pivotal tasks in the leadership process as well as the success of any head, context and culture, despite. Emotional brains, humility, ethical capacity plus the ability to stimulate followers count among these types of stable attributes.

It has been proven from the foregoing that an effective leader, irrespective of the organizational or environmental conditions, needs to adequately develop and imbibe these types of traits to succeed. Avolio, N. J., Gardner, W. T., Walumba, Farrenheit. O., Luthans, F. and May, D. R. (2004) Area code the face mask: A look at the procedure by which real leaders effect follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15: 80123.

Barker, Rich (2001). The size of leadership. Individual Relations, 54(4): 469494. Bennis, Warren (2006). Leadership Character and Traits.

Sold at http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leadchr.html (Mar 13, 2008) Comte-Sponville, A (2001). A small treatise on the great virtues. New York: Henry Holt & Company. Coutu, D (2004).

Putting commanders on the couch. A conversation with Manfred F. 3rd there’s r. Kets sobre Vries. Harvard Organization Review, 82(1): 6571.

Get, D. Dewey (2007). Command in the Pharmaceutic Industry. School of Mississippi Institution of Drug-store.

Available at http://drugtopics.modernmedicine.com/drugtopics/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=117440 (Mar 13, 2008) George, Meters Jennifer (2002). Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations, 53(8): 10271055.

Hogan, Robert, Gordon J. Curphy, and Joyce Hogan (2002). What We Find out about Leadership: Effectiveness and Personality. The American Psychiatrist, June.

Howell, Jane Meters., Shamir, Boas (2005). The Role Of Followers Inside the Charismatic Leadership Process: Interactions And Their Consequences. Management Review, 30 (1): 30 Roberts, B Harold (2001). Magic, meaning and leadership: Weber’s model and the empirical literature.

Man Relations, 54(6): 753771. Lehman, Zimmerman (2007). Eight Qualities of Command. ZimNotes.

Offered by http://www.zimmerman-lehman.com/leadership.htm (Mar 18, 2008). May, D. Ur., Chan, A., Hodges, To. and Avolio, B. T (2003). Developing the ethical component of authentic management. Organizational Characteristics, 32: 24760. May, R Douglas, Adrian Y. T. Chan, Timothy D. Hodges and Bruce J. Avolio (2003).

Developing the Moral Component of Authentic Command. Organizational Mechanics, 32 (3): 247-260. Morris, J. Andrew, CГ©leste M. Brotheridge and Ruben C. Urbanski (2005).

Taking humility to command: Antecedents and consequences of leader humbleness. Human Relations, 58(10): 13231350. Peterson, C. and Seligman, M (2004. ) Character strong points and benefits: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press.

Shamir, Boas, Robert L. House; Jordan B. Arthur (2001). The Motivational Associated with Charismatic Command: A Self-Concept Based Theory. Organization Technology, 4(4): 577- 594.

Smith, N. Brien, Ray Versus. Montagno and Tatiana D. Kuzmenko (2004). Transformational and Servant Leadership: Content and Contextual Comparisons. Record of Command & Organizational Research, 10(4): 80-93.

Tallman, Generic (2003). The organization leader while king, warrior, magician and lover: How Jungian archetypes affect the way males lead agencies. Organization Creation Record, 21(3): 19 Tourish, G. and Pinnington, A. (2002). Transformational leadership, corporate cultism and the spirituality paradigm: A great unholy trinity in the workplace?

Human Relations, 55: 14772. Vogan, Patty (2007). Discover the five leadership attributes you can adopt to attract and retain outstanding employees. AOL Business.

Available at http://smallbusiness.aol.com/manage/managing/article/_a/five-key-traits-of- greatleadership/20060426150709990001 (Mar 13, 2008). Williams, S (2002). Self-esteem plus the self-censorship of creative ideas.

Staff Review, 31(4): 495504.