Problem 1: Do you consider UNICEF’s advertisments will be powerful? Why or perhaps Why not?
I think UNICEF’s marketing campaign will not be because effective, given the fact that is certainly hard to compete with others with more superior and more financial advantages. Everybody knows that if a product is negative but with the ideal marketing strategies it will attract people’s focus and gain great demand. It is difficult for UNICEF to compete with the various other companies that fill people’s wants.
Problem 2: Guerilla marketing techniques deliberately intend to “ambush” consumer in public places. Is an effective marketing technique, or is it a violation of our right to go about our organization undisturbed? Do these techniques intrude in our lives? Basically, is there a stage where that they cross a line? During my point of you it may be taken as traversing the line, yet I consider that is justified because they are trying to support a noble trigger.
They are aiming to take ways of make people more conscious of the suffering of peoples around the world. Question several: What are different ways UNICEF could spread the word about the causes like the dangers of dirty water? UNICEF could propagate the word all over the world by using the most common type of mass media such as the internet, television, as well as the radio.
Which has a message given to the people with all the purpose of trying to gain mindful and human being sensibility. Through this it could help have necessary warnings to diminish this matter and help fantastic organization.