Press "Enter" to skip to content

Intellectual and technological property Essay

In the United States, the stakes of identifying the very best laws and policies for the use of intellectual and technological property are very high (U. S i9000. Congress, 1986).

As a general rule, programmers of software applications seek legal protection pertaining to intellectual property by using classic legal components found in copyright laws, trade secret, patent, brand and certification. Of these forms of protection the most easily possible protection is definitely through copyright law, which makes it illegal for making or spread copies of copyrighted material in the U. S. devoid of authorization (Qu & Potkonjak, 2003). BUGusa should be employing, first and foremost, the legal security of the laws of copyright in order to shield its intellectual property. In an instance of educating Congress Users regarding the methods taken by the FBI pertaining to trade and intellectual robbery, an example of an instance was provided by the FBI to the Congress.

Patrick Worthing was busted by the FBI after agreeing to sell Pittsburgh Plate Cup information for $1000 to a Pittsburgh agent posing on your behalf of Owens-Corning, Toledo, Kentkucky. Patrick Worthing was sentenced to 15 a few months in prison and three years probation intended for the Theft of Transact Secrets (Gallagher, 1998). Wiretime would have to encounter similar financial obligations if Charlie is caught in the action of transferring important corporate or mental information to his mom company. Walter could be guilty of may be a tort of intentional imposition of mental distress. The threat to hurt Steven can be interpreted as an assault.

These types of claims go up from apparently wrongful work practices. The tort requires that the defendant’s conduct was extreme and outrageous and that severe physical or psychological harm resulted. Courts on the other hand demand more (Lindemann & Grossman, 1983). Since Walter would not harm Steven in any way apart from threatening to hurt him, the chances of liability held against Walter and BUGusa are generally not tantamount into a lot.

Steve himself had handed over the info to Walt and had still left the small space without being actually harmed. Liu and Ye (2001) go over various issues of security and software security relevant to software agents ranging from market chaos, agent authorization and transaction. For security, the prime advice I would personally give to BUGusa would be to guard the entire program with constant and ideal security measures.

Sometimes the device is sophisticated and often certainly not designed with protection in mind. It is therefore important to study each part for its secureness weaknesses and protect this accordingly (Interactive Information Protection Policies, 2007). In my opinion, BUGusa may not have to face responsibility if the merchant was assaulted.

The criminal behaviour in the city is not under the power over the company and BUGusa need to highlight the point that the business does in terms of it can by causing the building and dock are well-lit. As for the vandalism and the theft, these are street offences which the govt and law-enforcement agencies need to be held in charge of. BUGusa may defend on its own by enduring a damage themselves through the vandalism. It can possibly go on to make sure for the future that increased secureness measures can be taken in order to avoid this kind of circumstances.

BUGusa needs to provide evidence that Wiretime has committed a lot of criminal activity against all of them. If Dorrie has been bribed by Wiretime to make this take action, or have been successfully verified into getting seen as doing a pattern of lawbreaker activity, LUJOSO can be said. BUGusa must prove that Charlie has been moving valuable info to Wiretime for over a big period of time.

Sally DoGood may have a successful case against BUGusa to get the atteinte of Product Liability. The merchandise, through legal definition, offers caused a defect due to the defect as a result of the basic conditions that it included seller’s failure to exercise reasonable care and would cause a sensible person properly of the customer to expect the used product to present simply no greater risk of defect than if the merchandise were new. Experts also say that if the plaintiff discovers that the supposed defect has become discovered, (which may be asserted in the case of BUGusa) the plaintiff can begin a negligence claim (Allee, 1984).